Pisha [she/her, they/them]

  • 3 Posts
  • 180 Comments
Joined 5 年前
cake
Cake day: 2020年12月23日

help-circle








  • Genuinely how on earth do you misinterpret the themes of a film so poorly lmao.

    I don’t appreciate that tone. Her accepting her sexuality ends in her having sex with what you call the “embodiment of male sexual domination” and then they both die. How does that make sense? It seems like everyone save the men loses out from her accepting her sexuality. And I don’t think it’s very coherent how the movie shows that sexual desire cannot be controlled – except via marriage – because that has murderous consequences, which can, however, also be resolved through sexual desire. I just don’t feel like the metaphors here work together and that is what I meant by “incomprehensible”.

    To put it more clearly: In the Eggers films I’ve seen, every woman either ends up dead or part of a childremoved cult and I don’t think women who suffer are automatically a sign of feminist politics.


  • It’s so bad! You can’t see a thing, there’s a magic exposition man, everyone constantly talks for no reason and the message appears to be that women having sexual desires causes the plague. Like, Werner Herzog did this movie already and Eggers instead decided to crib most of the changes for his version from Francis Ford Coppola (and from The Exorcist, the scariest movie of all time (!)). I should have realized after watching The VVitch that he’s just another middlebrow director with weird gender hang-ups that get lauded for being incomprehensible. Also, what kind of filmmaker is unable to make a movie set in the current day? Seriously now.