Orcocracy [comrade/them]

  • 0 Posts
  • 221 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 13th, 2021

help-circle
  • Yes, it is certainly fair to take the reading that the point is to play the game by continually resisting the fascist options that are provided. However, I’m not sure if the “was it worth it” hollow victory screen at the very end forgives the many hours of fascist “hard times make strong men” scenarios that precede it. If anything, the “was it worth it” further underlines the “hardness” of those “hard choices” and therefore does not contest or critique the fascist frame. The fascist would proudly answer “yes” and the game would appear perfectly coherent to them.

    It’s not that one needs to take a fascist reading of the game, but to borrow from Stuart Hall, the dominant reading of this game is clearly a fascist one. Yes, an antifascist reading is possible, but that reading is one built through a very careful process of negotiation with the text.



  • Just for fun I’m going to attempt to combine this with Walter Benjamin’s concept of the aura (probably not my best work): It’s not the act of farming or being called a ‘farmer’ that that dispels the aura, but the act of creating something that is designed to be posted. Nothing on social media truly has any aura to it in Benjamin’s sense, given the way social media is massively commodified by the corporations that run it, the influencers and advertisers that populate it, and by capitalist society in general. There is only the appeal to the concept of a nonexistent non-commodified authenticity, the “false spell of the commodity”. Calls of ‘aura’ on social media crave for that impossible authenticity that social media can’t possibly provide, and calls of ‘aura farming’ merely point out the posts that stray too far from the “false spell”.



  • Yes, and the Hollywood directors who depicted white-military-hero-man walking away from an explosion without looking at it weren’t card-carrying members of the Nazi party either. But that doesn’t mean that reading this stuff as having some relationship with the aesthetics of fascism is incorrect.

    If it’s often used in the form of an ironic critique to undermine the proud macho posturing of the ‘aura farmer’ then that is promising, but so often that layer of critique is quickly lost (for example in the online hero-worshipping of Patrick Bateman and Don Draper).


  • Oh so it’s like Evola, the Italian fascist who glorified war and violence so much that he went on contemplative walks during air raids. Unfortunately he wasn’t killed by this nonsense, only wounded. Now fascists on the internet share this picture to fucking honour this vile man:

    I wonder if this also ties in with the origin of the Hollywood trope about the hero walking away from the explosion while not looking at it. There’s definitely a lot to be said about aesthetics of fascism with respect to Hollywood, especially in its love of militaristic heroic ‘justice’.

    It’s also quite depressing how much contemporary slang in the English language can be traced back to the fascist parts of the internet (eg chad, alpha, based, incel, looks-maxing, possibly aura farming too). This doesn’t bode well for the future if that is what is influencing the way we speak to one another.


  • The original Game Boy weighs 220g (I’m not sure if that includes batteries or not), but the Switch Lite isn’t much more. It’s 275g with the battery included.

    However, the original Switch is quite a bit heavier at 398g, the Switch 2 is 534g, and the Steam Deck is a whopping 640g. The new Xbox handheld looks like it will be quite a bit bigger than the Steam Deck and will probably be even worse to carry around. These devices simply aren’t suitable for kids, and some of them aren’t that easy to hold for adults either. This is a real shame and pushes kids further towards using phones that are filled with exploitative freemium games and social media slop.







  • In a capitalist society we are constantly judging and being judged as having moral character based on our consumption. Pierre Bourdieu called this “distinction” and argued that the objects we buy and surround ourselves with represent “taste” that demonstrates and furthers class positioning in a capitalist society. Under capitalism, these objects carry great meaning and a person can communicate complex ideas and social information simply by how they hold a specific consumer good in their hand. Bourdieu argued that class struggle is also a “classification struggle”.