I think Excel formulas also use this, but it’s been a long time so I might be misremembering.
I think Excel formulas also use this, but it’s been a long time so I might be misremembering.
Yes, you’ve got it right. <> means ≠. 16 is not equal to 6.
What languages use this? I don’t like it!
On the other hand it goes well with >= and <=. If >= means “either > or =” then <> means “either < or >”, it checks out.
But I still don’t like it.
are the legs not allowed to be detached even for a moment for maintenance?
QR codes require the background colour (white) to extend at least 5 pixels around the corners. This won’t scan.
Damn you, I spent way too long watching his other top videos because of you
You mean the thing any credit card issuer does anyway?
Alright, good to know.
For generic contactless payments at shops? Or some closed system that only works with other PayPal users?
Until earlier this year, I could make NFC payments with the app of my credit card company. AFAIK contactless payments on Android were never locked to Google Pay/Wallet. But I have no idea why there’s no competition in this space. I’d expect e.g. PayPal to have something, but if they do I never heard of it - and I did look once, briefly.
I suppose it’s conceivable that there’s a bug in converting between different representations of Unicode, but I’m not buying and of this “detected which language is being spoken” nonsense or the use of character sets. It would just use Unicode.
The modulo idea makes absolutely no sense, as LLMs use tokens, not characters, and there’s soooooo many tokens. It would make no sense to make those tokens ambiguous.
While I agree that it’s awfully low nowadays, kudos to them if they know that’s all they need.
Huh? With IPv6 you get your own IP address, the ISP doesn’t need to know shit about ports. Your address is not behind a NAT anymore, and ports don’t need to be forwarded.
Perhaps you mean the ISP set up a firewall that blocks incoming connections? In which case, maybe you can have that firewall disabled? ISP firewalls and “safe browsing” packages are always shit.
To be honest though there might be some aspect to this I don’t know.
As a daily reader of SMBC, I can confidently tell you this rule is a suggestion at best.
If someone shared ROMs 20 years ago and stopped, Nintendo wouldn’t be able to do anything about it today. The statute of limitations does apply.
But if someone started sharing ROMs 20 years ago, and continued doing it every day until today, then that means they shared ROMs yesterday. The “crime” still happened yesterday.
Edit: but they care a lot more about preventing it from happening tomorrow.
I don’t think that’s a good argument. In a more general case, if you didn’t pursue your rights 10 years ago that doesn’t mean you can’t get your shit together and do it today. Maybe you’ve lost some of what you deserved but you still should get future benefits.
As for statue of limitations, if it keeps happening today then it doesn’t matter when it started. They could only talk about things that happened in the past year - it’s still being hosted and shared.
To be clear, I’m not taking Nintendo’s side, all efforts to preserve these games are amazing and I love to see everyone keep it up :)
Also feel free to cross-post this to the other community, or anywhere else.
We’ll see if my efforts fare any better.
I’ll try to add that in. It’s actually a fairly old story (in AI timescale) but you’re right, it’s worth mentioning.
They should add it in C++26