It must be hard on one to think an all knowing, all powerful being does not like you.
God would know you didn’t mean to pull out in front of them that one time.
It must be hard on one to think an all knowing, all powerful being does not like you.
God would know you didn’t mean to pull out in front of them that one time.
a “great rejuvenation” by 2049.
Few things, other than raising children take 25 years. Is China hoping for a baby boom?
The Linux community has never been of one mind on anything. We have always been against, and for, everything.
Some distro or project will integrate AI, or not, and it will be forked. And then forked again.
Many AI models are run on Linux. Linux won’t be left behind in any real sense. Linux won’t lose market share over this.
Linux developers paid by AI firms will integrate it into products. Those that volunteer will make their own decisions.
“Nut Job” is the same. Watched 5 minutes, then vowed to never tell the children about it.
Edit: I mean the sequel.
That is brilliant. I hope it works like old Amazon gift links where the sender does not get the recipient’s address. 😀
Evangelicals have been against women’s education my whole life (likely forever) for this and other reasons.
The last person cannot revoke the right to make commits.
I have no idea what that implies about the right to change the license.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_Rules_for_Life
Tis a duzey.
#I am not a bot, but a person that likes to link things.
Yup. And we are finding the frauds (faster?)
Couldn’t she already do that?
If there is sufficient RAM on the laptop, Linux will cache a lot of metadata in other cache layers without NFS-Cache.
NFS-Cache is a specific cache for NFS, and does not represent all caching that can be done of files over NFS. “Direct I/O” is also a specific thing, and should not be generalized in the meanings of “direct” and “I/O”.
Let’s skip those entirely for now as I cannot simply explain either. I doubt either will matter in your use case, but look back if performance lags.
One laptop accessing one NFS share will have good performance on a quite local network.
NFS is an old protocol that is robust and used frequently. NFSv3 is not encrypted. NFSv4 has support for encryption. (ZeroTier can handle the encryption.)
SSHFS is a pseudo file system layered over SSH. SSH handles encryption. SSHFS is maybe 15 years old and is aimed at convenience. SSH is largely aimed at moving streams of text between two points securely. Maybe it is faster now than it was.
ZeroTier allows for a mobile, LAN-like experience. If the laptop is at a café, the files can be accessed as if at home, within network performance limits.
NFS and ZeroTier would likely work.
When at home NFS will be similar to a local drive, though a but slower. Faster than SSHFS. NFS is often used to expand limited local space.
I expect a cache layer on NFS is simple enough, but that is outside my experience.
The issue with syncing, is usually needing to sync everything.
I hate to defend the EoD standup, but some people forget everything overnight. The only way to know what they did is to ask before the rest.
Yes, they truly are amazing. Yes, everyone should not be punished.
Mostly, it it to keep people from going home early. As such is indefensible.
The conditions necessary for the USA to lose dollar hegemony would themselves lead to massive shocks, or be the result of massive shocks. There is a lot of inertia in doing things the same way only because we have been doing them that way.
It is an interesting point.
Google has laid off their Python Foundation team and asked them to train their replacements who will be in the Munich office.
If it is a large concern, then encryption will help. There are even drives with built-in encryption exactly for this purpose.
Otherwise, will with non-repeated data. Repeat 9 times. (A heuristic, based on something I read 10 years ago.)
Do not use repeated digits. Those are optimized out.
The American Revolutionary War was deeply controversial.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loyalists_fighting_in_the_American_Revolution
The number of Americans who adhered to the British side after fighting commenced is still debated. An American historian has estimated that about 450,000 Americans remained loyal to Britain during the Revolution.
100% chance of some Americans, not a 100% chance of 100% of Americans. No one gets 100% of Americans to anything.
Pretty sure the Chad is trying to defend their country by destroying the aggressors revenue stream. (I could have missed some other news though.)