Lemmy alts: @Link

  • @lemmy.ml
  • @lemmy.slrpnk.net
  • @lemmy.world
  • @lemmy.one
  • @lemm.ee
  • @beehaw.org
  • @sopuli.xyz
  • @feddit.nl

Mastodon: @[email protected]

  • 0 Posts
  • 10 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle




  • Link@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Serious concern and asshole move? Yes. Gpl violation? Not sure. You could argue you are not restricted to do whatever you want with the code you receive with a subscription. But if you share the code, they don’t want you as a customer anymore and won’t give you new code. I don’t know if the GPL allows that.


  • Link@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Certainly in retrospect. Back then they defended the decision by saying they wanted to shift their resources to centos stream, and that would be fair enough. But now it’s clear that wasn’t their motivation at all. They wanted to kill the free RHEL fork in the hope to attract more customers, as a lot of people already suspected.


  • The other thing to consider is that the technology just doesn’t exist for there to be a viable ‘federated’ YouTube.

    Well, Peertube exists. But I agree it is very hard to get close to the amount of videos YouTube hosts without it becoming too expensive. But that is even true for companies like Google, which is why they are pushing these changes. It seems like people need to accept that a video platform must either show ads, make you subscribe, or receive substantial donations.

    I almost can’t believe Wikipedia is only 20GB btw. Does that include all the pictures on there?