Just an Oil man in town from Dallas.
Disqualification
You HAVE to make an account and sign on when you first open it. On a privacy focused sub, that should be an instant DQ
Marijuana
You read my mind you fuzzy little man peach
I’d just be happy she has a costume on. Around here we get grown adults with no costumes asking for candy with their kids. I guess I enable them because I don’t want to call them out in front of their own kids, but come on.
THATS the rest of the quote!!?! Ha. Man I’ve always just heard it stop at “ childish things”. Makes more sense now
I think Xbox 360 played those
This was actually Steve Jobs original idea for the iPhone. Instead of native apps everything would be a web app.
I’m torn because I do hate responsive design to the max. But I also hate how the web has evolved into a pseudo os with everything in JavaScript. Don’t get me started on electron.
I like the native app approach so I can actually use the is as intended it many apps these days are just a wrapper for the webapp anyway
Keepassxc and macpass do it for free
Arnold palmers. Nothing beats em
netflix on linux firefox comes to mind. Just changing the useragent shows that it’s not a technical problem.
This feels closer to the solution, but again a mountain is natural, but will be there for 1000 years.
But you see the arbitrary distinction that you’re setting up by differentiating man as separate from nature. I’d argue that humans themselves are “natural” creatures. But every human alive is “man made”
This is the kind of shit that keeps me up at night. Thinking about all the casual horror in the world. I’ve read about these “slaver” ants that kidnap eggs from another colony only to raise them as slaves for the rest of their life. Or those wasps that lay their eggs inside other living insects which then hatch and consume the host.
There are so so many insects on earth, so these fucked up horrors are just happening on a massive scale all the time all around us.
I concur. My gut is telling me there is a difference, but when I try to articulate it, I can’t.
Kind of like that senator who couldn’t define pornography, but her know it when he sees it.
I’m also thinking beyond housing. It seems like such an arbitrary distinction to say that things humans make aren’t “natural “ but things that animals make are.
Not to be too pedantic but aren’t we as humans part of nature? Therefore what we make is a direct natural creation?
Is it the scale that makes things unnatural? I’ve never seen animal cities, but a single anthill has a higher population density than any city, and it’s 100% not “naturally “ occurring.
It depends on if you’re handsome or not