Less of a staw man, more of a… straw curse?
Mostly a lurker. Abandoned Reddit before it was cool
Less of a staw man, more of a… straw curse?
Because it’s not like a wave, such as waves in the sea.
Actually, it is. It’s the same meaning we’ve had for waves in physics since the first time someone figured how to plot a 2d graph. Only the medium is a quantum field instead of water, its amplitude is probabilistic instead of height, and instead of time we have some other property of distributions, usually space-time.
It’s a scientific fact that physical matter does not exist in its physical form when unobserved.
No, it’s not. The quantum field and the quantum wave exist whether or not you observe it, only the particle behavior changes based on interaction. Note how I specifically used the word “interaction”, not “observation”, because that’s what a quantum physicist means when they say the wave-particle duality depends on the observer. They mean that a wave function collapses once it interacts definitely, not only when a person looks at it.
It certainly invalidates physical reality as the “source of truth”, so to say
How so, when the interpretation you’re citing is specifically dependant on the mechanics of quantum field fluctuation? How can physical reality not exist when it is physical reality that gives you the means to (badly) justify your hypothesis?
That’s based on a pseudoscientific interpretation of quantum physics not related to actual physics.
That’s pseudoscientific bullshit. Quantum physics absolutely does tell us that there is a real physical world. It’s incredibly counterintuitive and impossible to fully describe, but does exist.
You could have a database of your brain… but it wouldn’t be conscious.
Where is the proof of your statement?
???
If we never knew capitalism we would say the same thing
We do say the same thing. It’s why we want to crush this shitty system. Because we know it is shit and doesn’t work.
needs regulations at every turn
A privilege which Anarchy doesn’t get.
I’m not a Christian
Neither am I. It’s a figure of speech.
I don’t think it’s at all possible for a society to be perfect, ever.
Then you shouldn’t campaign for the one form of government which does pretty much require a perfect society.
In other words, literally nothing.
My brother in christ, focus on the whole discussion instead of taking it one argument at a time. An imperfect society will, by necessity, fail to the issues raised previously.
as long as human beings live in societies they will seek cooperation and justice.
You defeated your own position. Humans aren’t, nor can be perfecly just nor perfectly cooperative.
And then what stops one small group from slowly becoming a giant group again?
Good luck with that. You may need to substitute all humans with robots.
Stop using drugs, you’re making literally no sense.
They do, but not so much that your average home user would notice without having more than enough time to fix the problem.
Read it as 120TB at first and my eyes nearly jumped out of their sockets.
Removed by mod
You’re pathetic.
Now? Apparently you missed… literally every single civics and social science class during your education. We always have. In fact, I can effectively guarantee you break several laws every single week.