Please consider donating to the Open Medicine Foundation to help people suffering from extremely disabling and underfunded lifelong illnesses with no know treatment.
Shit defence from brentford. But beautiful scissor kick goal from carvalhio
Sorry I didn’t mean to sound cocky. It sounds like a byproduct of slow federation. As I edited my comment almost immediately (before you replied) after posting it, to correct said number and provide a source, but it doesn’t look like it got to your end.
Also MAU stands for monthly active users and not total users. But I realise that acronym may not be widespread.
So bluesky has 5 million monthly active users while mastodon has 1 million?
Thats a fivefold difference.
True. So both have around 10 million total users. Bluesky has no monthly active user statistic. But around 1 million daily posters according to this https://bsky.jazco.dev/stats
While Mastodon has ~1 million monthly active users.
So sounds like bluesky’s got a lot more activity with that many daily posters, as of now, anyways.
Even if your numbers are true. Mastodon has existed for 7 years. Bluesky for less than one.
So logically the precentage of users to active users should be much higher on Bluesky.
Also number of accounts is possibly a bad metric to judge mastodon because of the federation.
For example, I have 8 mastodon accounts (tried a couple different instances and programmed a couple rss bots to give me a news feed).
I mean thanks to bridgy you can communicate across blusky and mastodon. For example people can follow my mastodon account on bluesky.
And bluesky has gained > 8 million users in the past couple months. Mastodon has 900 odd thousand MAU.
So clearly the majority have gone to one.
More likely twitter users.
And yes it’s corporate which is less good than mastodon.
But it is add-free, has a working algorithm, is feature rich, is open-source, lets you self-host etc. Full defederation is coming soon too.
Having used both bluesky (self hosted) and mastodon. The experience is simply far better on bluesky.
Unlike lemmy vs reddit. Where (except for active user count) there isn’t really a tradeoff. Lemmy is simply far better.
-football [email protected] Paris Saint-Germain - Girona
@[email protected] -football [email protected] Brentford - Leyton Orient
Last season half the starters were injured. We were absolutely ravaged. Barely made it out of relegation. So I think (even though we already now have 3 injured forwards) were going to do a decent bit better this season. Also the fact we had easyish fixtures helps.
I mean Man City def has better quality, but Brentford managed to play well, and do good both in posession and XG, beating man city, which is impressive.
I mean it’s decent but unless you’re a fan of either team probably can find a funner game to watch. PSG’s played really well, just a mistake from Nuno and Beraldo gave off a questionable Pen.
PSG are definitely funner to watch this season, the post-galacticos team has a nice feel to it.
Dembouz unlocked headers this season hahah 1-1
This is what happens when half our defenders are injured and the other half are too tired from international break.
Great game from the bees. Unlucky loss.
Bluesky has an algorithm
And the fact that bluesky has many features mastodon does not. Namely, an algorithm.
Hey I’ve had a couple chats with Taylor. She’s real nice. Cool to see her posted on lemmy.
ooo interesting thanka
Dominant psg performance but Girona’s doing well to put pressure and make shooting harder, hence why (coupled with a bit of luck) PSG hasn’t scored as of now