How so?
How so?
as they’re robust
I would argue they are just what was used during development. After that, it never changes.
Why did they use it back then? Were there many alternatives? I do not know.
I can do the same after simply letting my skin soak in water for a few minutes at some points like in the foot arch.
On a side note, does lotion actually “soak in” in meaningful amounts? Wasn’t that a myth/sales pitch?
What hardware does not run on 12 V?
Define ultra low power. Given the 10 TB + mirror (why?) I assume at least 2 HDDs have to spin. So at least 20 W total? I mean they can spin down, but leaving the system on 24/7 seems a bit far fetched, even if it only consumes 1 watt (0.1 A load, 2.4 Ah per day).
Telepathy?
Telepathy is the translation of thought into transmissible signals without sound that can be received and understood either by computer or others.
Ah well then this post is telepathy. What an odd “definition”.
Not needed what…?
I agree, if the data loss is no issue and there is no need to recover anything, just start from scratch.
Wait… so someone actually shaved a cat? People are awful, poor animals treated as cute little toys.
Who was oppressed here?
I am using YouTube-dl, but you would need to implement the logic for the downloads.
Wait, drawing? That is a different skill? This is what I understand as spatial skill (Wiki: Spatial ability)
I have to strongly disagree, you overestimate what people know/can/want to do. Some, sure, but not the majority. They either stay ignorant or are too lazy. Just look at add blocker usage. I can not even imagine to live without them, but here we are, I am the tiny minority! Most either do not care or are too stupid or somehow happen to not know about them.
Why are spatial skills a surprising skill of a structural engineer? Isn’t that like… crucial?
Hahahaha thank you
You are correct! Sorry for mixing this up. I must have looked at research Numbers back in the day and simply used that as my reference now, which of course is then correct if look at research again…
I always remembered then to be somewhat better than those numbers and this paper agrees with me (figure 1). 14 % is not premium (efficiency) for polycrystaline in 2010. Figure 1 shows 20 % for polycrystaline at 2010 and 25 % for single crystal. Thin film, on the other hand, is down there at maybe 15 %.
Are you using thin film cells? That would explain this low value.
Oh, I get it, was reading as base 2 and confused by that. Essentially Roman numerals without all the fancy shortcuts.