https://youtu.be/oSIPiB2JEkA

For the license to be changed every team member needs to submit a written agreement that he agrees to the change, otherwise their contributions must be removed as they were written under a different license, the only exception is usually permissive licenses such as MIT/BSD 3 clause.

Usually, to rugpull FOSS contributors, companies who maintain FOSS software ask contributors to sign a CLA which waives their rights and lets the control their contributions. Immich isn’t doing any of that, and it will likely remain AGPL forever because changing the license will be a big hassle for them with the amount of contributors.

Hi, I recommend you read the book “Run Your Own Mail Server”. The fact that a book exists for this topic is all the proof you need to not do this decision. But if you absolutely must, this is the way.

Only I rely on my services and if they break I’ll fix them myself.

I don’t run Immich specifically but all other software I run is on :latest tags and unattended-upgrades on Debian. It works so, why bother?

This is exactly what I needed in my servers. An AI assistant to help me… do what exactly?

Docker Engine is open source. They could’ve easily contributed patches to it which just further proves that it is a NIH syndrome response.

Yes… I remember finding my dad’s CD labeled “Need for Speed Most Wanted” when I was 5. Taught me a valuable lesson.

I use Docker exclusively. Podman is the NIH syndrome response to an industry standard. It has its benefits but Docker just works.

They have mailing lists where they announce releases. Since it’s not that common for distros like Debian I don’t mind the manual labor once in a while. I only seed 3 ISOs anyway as I don’t think the rest contribute that much anyway. (Debian, Arch and Mint)

I think the logo is cool ;)

Did you try zotify?

I remember researching the topic a while back. SimpleMDM seems to do it, but it requires paying Apple $300 a year. Luckily, Mosyle allows up to 30 devices for free.

This is a friendly reminder that NAT is not a firewall and should not be treated as such.

Thank you.

I don’t think so, GTA has a lot of pathing and logic, I think it makes sense

It was resolved by people not using it if they didn’t want to. Linux Kernel is still GPLv2

If it’s just logic and stuff then not really. Most of the video’s game size comes from assets. Textures/npc etc.

There were news about Ubuntu doing it too some time ago, maybe they realized it’s not feasible yet. I don’t follow their development as I don’t use those distros

And when they’re right, it’s usually addressed. I say usually because GNOME exists.

Every change will bring it’s fair share of complainers, not much we can do about that. LILO to GRUB, SysV to systemd and now X11 to Wayland. No one is forcing your hand (unless you use a pre-packaged distro like Ubuntu/Fedora, in which case you go with whatever the distro provides), keep using X11 if you want stability, if you wanna dip your toes in bleeding-edge software and increase it’s userbase to show hardware manufacturers that their drivers need to be updated (I’m looking at you, NVIDIA) then feel free to mess around.

Eventually the day will come when Wayland apps will simply not launch on X11 and you’ll migrate too.