Kind for them to get a partner for the dog so the dog won’t feel lonely.

Can anyone explain the true reason why US make such decision?

I thought the onion was supposed to be fake news.

AI bullied OP so hard, OP had to travel in the past to escape AI and had to use an old meme template.

I’m not sure if you’re being sarcastic or not. If yes, any reason why?

So many would like to say no when asked for donations but didn’t for whatever reason? Hard to argue on this one since it’s subjective, but personally, I surely wouldn’t find it difficult to say ‘no thanks’.

True, but how far in the past? The context matters in this case.

But what makes a meme, a meme? Or funny in this case. Most if not all good memes have to be relatable, so your meme is kinda related to real life. I mean, for some people, your meme is relatable in their life.

Same. I guess I’m finally useful.

Humans are the ones that create video games, including Pokemon. Are you implying that the person who’s capable of creating video games can’t have rational thinking and create interesting plots to make the game more engaging or interesting? And I’m pretty sure there are plenty of other games that support or at least implement the idea of antinatalism for the plot. And seriously, Pokemon is the first thing you thought of from a video game? You don’t have good taste, do you?

I don’t know what to say anymore except, very mature dude. I’ll just say this, learn to control your ego and accept that there will always be a bigger fish.

Of course, still can’t create any meaningful argument. Let’s not waste anymore of our time and end this conversation here.

I’m sorry, I’m going to offend you for personal reasons. It’s possible that you’re denying your intellectual incapability due to your ego by saying that I’m unable to converse in a way that you would understand instead of taking time to understand yourself. It’s not like I’m using fancy words unlike you. Not to mention that you’re taking my comments way out of context most of the time, and when I try to disprove your claims, you don’t even try to challenge me back or argue reasonably and instead create excuses such as “my points are meaningless” or “I’m unable to converse properly”. And you’re being hypocritical by saying my comments are “diatribe”. I tried to make most of my comments except this one as neutral as possible and not mention anyone specifically, and you dare to say my comments are “diatribe”? The way I see it, you’re the one that “attack” me first. Your comments really show your insecurity towards your intellect and instead of arguing or debating properly, you take my comments out of context and create excuses to avoid debating because I assume you can’t create reasonable arguments.

To be honest, neither do I. Like I said, it’s just my opinions. I don’t have proof or facts that it will work as intended. Take it as you will. I don’t mind getting sidetracked though, as long as the conversation is meaningful. There is always something to learn, and improve.

I think we’re getting sidetracked here. I am familiar with some of them, or if I don’t, I can just google or use AI. Still, you haven’t answer my previous question.

I’m sorry. I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say. Which claim are you talking about previously? And I don’t know what you mean by what I’m trying to do. All I was doing is simply providing my opinions or solutions to remove or reduce evil in this world. Assuming full equality has been achieved, then there should be no reason for anyone to have antisocial behavior.

Can’t say I respect your opinion, but your life, your choice i guess. I’m simply trying to disprove your claims, can’t say what I comment is 100% true, just simply my opinions. I understand if some people choose to be ignorant. Ignorance is a bliss after all.

Firstly, I propose to exterminate every life, not just humans. We as humans didn’t even consider other species just because we’re superior, or lucky in evolution i guess. Secondly, unfairness is a fact, not simply because the way i see it. You can’t see the world from your perspective only. Think about the unfortunate people who live in poverty or starvation or in other unfortunate situations, especially those who live in the third world country. You may think that those people deserve to be put in such situations because they choose to be in such situations, but I don’t believe in free will. Do you even wonder why people make certain choices and not the other choices? Everyone is unique for a reason. And I didn’t say nobody deserves to live, more like nobody deserves to suffer unfairly. And I’m suggesting to end life, not forcing it. Who knows, maybe life will end itself, from climate change or nuclear war or when the sun or every star in the universe dies. Some people and even other animals killed themselves for whatever reason.

Wdym people disagree with me? I believe inequality is what causes evil to exist in this world, and to make everything equal might be impossible, or even if it is, life will be extremely boring It might be impossible to achieve happiness, because everything is the same. A world without pain or suffering but also devoid of happiness. I suggest to eliminate every life to eliminate suffering.

Well the force part is not about equality, but to end all life.