Well, they’re separated by the Panama canal, so by the same token that Africa and Asia aren’t the same land mass, neither are the Americas.
- 0 Posts
- 61 Comments
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's something that you were surprised to find out a lot of people hate?8·2 years agoFor some of us at some times in our lives, having a relationship with two people is less work. It requires much more communication, better scheduling, and much more attention to your partners’ feelings … but that might be a good investment of time anyhow, and often gets overlooked.
I find that having multiple partners helps me appreciate each partner much more, for themselves – it’s easy to mix up how much you love just having a partner and being loved, with how you actually feel about that person. Poly gives you the distance and contrast to see your partners clearly, and that can be really special.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's something that you were surprised to find out a lot of people hate?8·2 years agoYeah, this is my dynamic as well. My partner and I have been together for a decade and poly from the beginning. It’s not at all a secret, but people are so used to monogamy as a norm that they often just think our other partners are super close friends that hang out at our house a lot.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's something that you were surprised to find out a lot of people hate?7·2 years agoI’ve been in poly relationships most of my adult life, around 15 years now. I’m certainly familiar with the type of relationship you describe, but the long term, stable poly relationships are the ones that have been poly from the get go.
I don’t tend to date people who are “opening things up” in a previously monogamous relationship, because being someone’s learning experience is a bummer.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's something that you were surprised to find out a lot of people hate?10·2 years agoI’ve been in poly relationships for years. They work really well for me and my significant others, but we are pretty discreet about it because folks tend to be huge assholes about it.
Generally, you don’t see the poly relationships that work great; mostly, people see the type of scenario one of your other commenters described because the stable relationships are less visible.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How many ingredients does it take to call it a salad?1·2 years agoWe don’t! That’s the joy of it, just like people do, our algorithm will constantly waffle back and forth and argue with itself over whether these things are salads
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How many ingredients does it take to call it a salad?1·2 years agoI know, I was being humorous but it is in fact the way most categorization works. Very seldom is it a taxonomy; the way we recognize faces, voices, shapes, etc … it’s all probabilistic.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How many ingredients does it take to call it a salad?3·2 years agoWhat we need is a salad categorizing multilayer neural network
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•How many ingredients does it take to call it a salad?54·2 years agoSo teeeeechnically, a salad is a dish composed of mixed ingredients. You could make the argument that you mix any two set of chopped ingredients and bingo bongo, it’s a salad.
However, I like to think that dishes’ ingredients aren’t a taxonomic thing, they’re a probabilistic thing. In other words, there’s no such thing as “not salad” or “salad”, only shades of saladness.
-
Serve it cold? Ok it’s saladier
-
It’s made up of chopped ingredients? Saladier still
-
Those ingredients are mostly vegetables? Getting pretty saladish
-
They’re mixed together? Even more salad like
-
They’ve got some sort of dressing mixed in? Now it’s very likely a salad!
… and so on. To me, your SO’a dish has a pretty high Salad Probability^tm
-
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death21·2 years agoLike every ceasefire.
Probably the reason Ukraine doesn’t want a ceasefire…
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death43·2 years agoYeah, unironically it does in this instance.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death51·2 years agoThe US negotiated with the Japanese.
The allies negotiated with the Nazis.
You know both these groups surrendered unconditionally, right?
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death41·2 years agoWeirdly specific
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death83·2 years agoThey are, mate. You act like the West is standing behind Ukraine threatening to shoot anyone that retreats. We’re sending em guns and money, if they wanted to stop fighting they could make that decision tomorrow.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death103·2 years agoRussia can, very straightforwardly, retreat to Russia. Boom, peace!
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death105·2 years agoAh yes, “Glory to Ukraine,” seems like a super specific slogan that can only be associated with one movement. In no way is it a generically nationalist slogan.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death122·2 years agowhat a ceasefire would provide
Like the 2014 ceasefire? All it does is give Russia the opportunity to retrench and dig in. When the Ukrainians ask for a ceasefire, then I’ll support one.
Badass_panda@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.ml•Zelensky dismisses compromise with Putin, pointing to Prigozhin’s death96·2 years agoRussia’s monetary system is in collapse and its economy is in free fall… the war took up 45% of its budget last year, its foreign exchange reserves have long since run dry and its first defensive line is slowly crumbling.
If it ends up being a war of endurance, Russia’s going to be in a far worse position in a year than they are now.
The definition of what “good coffee” is vary from place to place. The northeast has absolutely phenomenal American style coffee (focus on drip coffee and long pours), a lot of Europeans are after a really good espresso for €1.5.
I get it, but if you are just trying to make the point that, if a country thinks they’ll eventually lose, it’s better for everyone if they give up quickly … then this historical example doesn’t seem relevant.
Given that Ukraine already gave up quickly once (in Crimea) and that Russia simply waited until it was convenient to invade them again, I’m sure you can understand why Ukrainians think it’s necessary to fight this one out.
Now, the war of the Triple Alliance is often held up as an example of how a minority of belligerents can create massive devastation by continuing a guerilla war after losing the conventional war; if Ukraine seems in danger of losing the conventional war, I’ll admit it’s a relevant parallel, otherwise it isn’t terribly relevant.