• realbadat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Then you should know that to move things left, you need to vote more local progressives.

    People don’t start out going for the presidency (and they shouldn’t, as the obvious recent mistake of a president shows).

    Slowing down fascism provides opportunity for progressive politicians to make moves in the right direction, and take positions that are higher up the ladder.

    Allowing a nose dive to fascism prevents the progressive folks from having an opportunity.

    In short - yes, slowing it down is good enough at the presidential level.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      I do know that. You seem like you’re pretty in tune as well, so you should be aware that being permissive and/or welcoming of 3rd party presidential candidates generally favor democrats at the state and local level.

      • realbadat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        That really depends on the candidate.

        And it depends on the main candidates as well. What we have now is “strong” words against genocide while continuing, or fascist genocide. The third party candidate (RFKJr) is an anti-vax, conspiracy theorist, covid-19 denying, whacko with name recognition for a while host of democrats, and was one until. He’s a spoiler candidate. Voting 3rd party in this election is, imo, dangerous.