• LwL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    Actually determining the total gain seems insanely hard to impossible. Percentage of turnover is just easier to implement, and still effective if it can scale up as it can for gdpr.

    • fluckx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Even if the total gain is determinable, the fine should be at least x% turnover +total gain.

      It’s easy math otherwise. If i try to steal something from a shop and just have to pay it if i get caught There’s not much incentive to not do it.

      Well. Besides being a decent human being that doesn’t steal from local shops.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is what auditors are for.

      If it were up to me there would be a government office specifically to audit businesses in such cases. When a court deems it necessary, a team of auditors would be attached to a company and have access to all of their financial records, for the express purpose of determining how much of their revenue was gained through the illegal activity. The company would be responsible for paying all of the expenses of the audit team for as long as the audit takes (if the company drags their feet in giving access to records, it costs them).

      For the same time period, a government representative would be given a seat on the company executive board and be privy to all board meetings. As long as the company is under audit they are also under operational observation.

      At the conclusion of the audit, all revenue determined to proceed from the illegal activity is forfeit, and a fine is issued for each violation.

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        If the fines are against the executives personal assets first, a full freeze on all of them during this process would be prudent during the audit. Confiscating their passports and accessorizing with a nice ankle bracelet during the process might help as well.

        • Kichae@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t really need to freeze them. Just a snapshot of what their assets were at the time, and then promise to go after their family and friends assets, if theirs appear to be suddenly lacking. Finding themselves totally isolated and unemployable is a much bigger threat than just the fine, or even prison.

          I like the passport and ankle bracelet thing, though.