• davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hmm. I like the concept but think there are practical issues: Suddenly everyone who owns apartments or other rental property in a major city immediately sells it (even if just to be demolished) and kicks out the current renters. Mass homelessness affecting disproportionately those worst off. Perhaps the cost of Buying a home would drop due to all that property for sale - especially if the apartments can be sold as condos, but I’m not sure if it would compensate enough, and would be a huge mess for some time.

    • Kelly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Suddenly everyone who owns apartments or other rental property in a major city immediately sells it (even if just to be demolished) and kicks out the current renters.

      Why? Paying for demo would be costing them more money. Same with sitting on it without tenants.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        What I mean is that they couldn’t afford to keep it in any way and may end up selling it at just the land value (if that)

        • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          The flip side is that it would be sold to people looking to buy one.

          It wouldn’t push up homelessness, just more who rent would instead own