• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The fact that 200 years ago, Scotland had about 2 million inhabitants, all of whom were virtually exclusively ethnic scots. Up until about 40 years ago there weren’t even keeping track of that, with over 99% being ethnic scots at the start of the census in the 80s. (Source: Wikipedia)

    Now this ai is obviously fabricating bullshit because it was trained to be diverse and inclusive.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There were more Scots in Africa at the time yet you won’t see AI adding them to pictures.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There was some African dude who the king enjoyed so now it makes sense to depict your typical Scottish man in 1820s as black lol

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes. There clearly were no black people in Scotland near the time of the US civil war.

      You’re pissy because “scottish” doesn’t mean white people to everyone.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dude im just looking at demographics… am not even Scottish. Doesn’t change the fact that what this ai does is blatantly made up and could be considered falsifying history.

        • Neato@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          and could be considered falsifying history.

          An AI said there might be black people in Scotland. PROTECT THE HISTORY!

          lol

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why would you want to have inclusive history at the cost of accuracy? That’s literally blind adherence to ideology. You know, the thing religious zealots or nationalists are doing.

            The point of history is that we can learn from it, and for that it must be kept as accurate as possible.

            Accepting this in the grand scope of things somewhat irrelevant inaccuracy, just because you want the past to be wholesome and coherent with current beliefs, just opens the door to more critical areas of history being changed to fit the narrative.

            Just look at the American republicans, who are in the process of banning slavery and black oppression as a topic kids are taught about.