This logic would actually disagree with unionizing (because you sort of have to bite the hand that is feeding you) but would agree with accepting a onetime pizza donation while still biting the hand (because you only shouldn’t bite a hand that repeatedly feeds you).
But now you’re just walking directly into the trap.
Pizza consumption does not constitute a lawful binding agreement of any kind
You’re ignoring the universal truth of never biting the hand that feeds you.
This logic would actually disagree with unionizing (because you sort of have to bite the hand that is feeding you) but would agree with accepting a onetime pizza donation while still biting the hand (because you only shouldn’t bite a hand that repeatedly feeds you).