weird case with potentially terrible ramifications for tattoo artists

    • novibe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, technically there was profit? Like you have to pay to get a tattoo, and they can get expensive. But still, this feels like it goes against even the spirit of the shitty copyright laws, so yeah…

      • viva_la_juche [they/them, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        True, for some reason at the time I assumed they sued the person getting the tat not Kat. But yeah I agree, people have been getting random tattoos of things forever, Miles davis has been dead for ages, everything about this feels like a cash grab. just goofy Af all around