• SpezBroughtMeHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And you don’t think solving that equation from the other end should be what happens? Just pay people more ad nauseum while the cost of living continually skyrockets?

    • grayman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      So my 16yo son wants a summer job. He should be able to stock shelves 40 hrs/wk for $1000/wk (the living wage in my metropolitan area)?

      Not allowing there to be entry level jobs that pay below the cost of living prevents youth (and others in certain situations) from being able to enter the market, thereby reducing their skill weekend they do enter later, which easily leads to involuntary unemployment. It actually creates the situation that’s attempting to be solved. The higher the cost to businesses for these entry level jobs, the fewer employed in them, and thus the higher the unemployment.

      • whatwhatwutyut@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So during not-summer who is stocking shelves? My guess to your answer is that high schoolers will, but then who will work fast food restaurants during school hours?

        Too many jobs are considered “entry level”. If people used them as stepping stone jobs, the companies would cease to function properly.

        For example my father thinks that all fast food positions except Manager are entry level. But I can guarantee you he’d be pissed if only the manager was working in the mornings when he wants coffee.