The U.S. vetoed a UN Security Council resolution Friday calling for a ceasefire to the fighting in Gaza.

The U.S. and Israel have opposed calls for a ceasefire, saying it would strengthen Hamas.

The vote was delayed for several hours over worries the U.S. would veto it. Diplomats from several Arab nations met with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken to try to convince the U.S. to abstain from voting.

As a permanent member of the council, the U.S. has veto power, and had signaled it planned to block the resolution. The U.K. abstained from the vote, while the 13 other members of the council voted for it.

read more: https://www.semafor.com/article/12/08/2023/un-security-council-votes-on-gaza-ceasefire-resolution-amid-israel-hamas-conflict

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was more meant that they couldn’t vote no then not veto. That being the case they should have at least abstained like the UK.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s to prevent nuclear war. If everyone voted to invade or harshly punish a powerful country they could respond.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        11 months ago

        That is the explanation I was given, but these days I think that’s more of a rationalization than an explanation. Closer to the truth, I think, is that those are the countries that came out of WWII the victors, and so they wrote the rules.