• angrynomad@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    KeePass does that for free…

    All these upvotes for bitwarden seem really suspicious

    • lue3099@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it’s not suspicious. It’s an open source well vetted audited selfhosted password manager. If youve tried vaultwarden or the official image it’s extremely easy to setup meaning a very low barrier for entry.

    • runaway@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What KeePass doesn’t do for free is sync across as many devices as you want without issues. For a couple years I was using KeePass + Syncthing, but I kept having sync errors and ended up having to merge databases on a regular basis. Dealing with moving the database around is difficult when you’re regularly creating new accounts and authenticating from four plus devices.

    • ofak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      All those defenders of KeePass here in Lemmy makes me really suspicious if everybody has to fit the nerd mould to be accepted. Really feels like shit subteddits tbh.

    • reddit_sucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m on the other fence. All of the Keepass shilling is pretty extreme. It’s a local solution, which works sure. However, I want something I can immediately use from a new location without having to reimport everything all the time. There’s far more people astroturfing for Keepass than Bitwarden dude.