• irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Did you just describe what I did in a reductive way, without even attempting to explain your point? Why should I listen to you?

      Try attacking the idea itself: “You’re just kicking the can down the road. It’s the exact same idea, phrased differently.”

        • irmoz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Attack the argument or accept that you’re wrong.

          “Small dick energy” is just a way to say “small dick” without getting called out for it.

          • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Begging people to debate you about how saying small dick energy is like dropping hard Rs is the most small dick energy thing I can think of, no thanks

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              See, you still show no evidence you have any clue what I’m saying, so how can I take you seriously? I never said it is “like droping hard Rs”. Seriously, get up to speed or get lost.

              • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Here’s an actual, completely serious input for you: If you want people to take you seriously and actually engage, don’t start by comparing them to outspoken racists. People will prefer to roast you

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I’m not. I didn’t realise people would be so confused by analogies.

                  I compared the rhetoric. That’s the point of such devices. You don’t have to be a racist to use similar logic to them.

                  This isn’t complicated whatsoever.

                  The guy is hiding behind semantics, so I described another instance of hiding behind semantics. I deliberately used an extreme example so the error was more clear. Basic reductio ad absurdum.

                  • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    How deep are you willing to go before you admit you made a dumbass comparison?

                    Look, I can pretend I’m smart by invoking latin shit too: adversus solem ne loquitor

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ooh, name calling! Based on a willful misinterpretation of what they said, too. A sure sign of a solid argument!