guys imprisoning people who follow a certain religion for “terrorism” is good, now that that’s done away with we can get back to our discussion on how terrible gitmo is
Both states say the former though, who are you kidding? You can argue over which one is being more truthful but you’re literally just deciding to think critically only about the US’s justification and not China’s.
I think it’s also important to note that the majority of people sent through the re-education system just ended up with vocational training and a job that paid significantly more than what they had before. That alone is probably the biggest driver of de-radicalization. Who would think that improving people’s material conditions would lead to them being less inclined to join a radical separatist organization?
guys imprisoning people who follow a certain religion for “terrorism” is good, now that that’s done away with we can get back to our discussion on how terrible gitmo is
that comment was me deciding youre infringing on my freedoms
there’s a very big difference between “imprisoning muslims because they might be terrorists” and “imprisoning muslims because they follow islam”
Both states say the former though, who are you kidding? You can argue over which one is being more truthful but you’re literally just deciding to think critically only about the US’s justification and not China’s.
I think it’s also important to note that the majority of people sent through the re-education system just ended up with vocational training and a job that paid significantly more than what they had before. That alone is probably the biggest driver of de-radicalization. Who would think that improving people’s material conditions would lead to them being less inclined to join a radical separatist organization?