After the (temporary) defederation announcement of earlier i checked the Lemmy repo to see if there was already a ticket on the federation limiting option like Mastodon’s that people mentioned Lemmy doesn’t yet have. Not only i didn’t find it, i also saw that there’s about 200+ open tickets of variable importance. Also saw that it’s maintained mostly by the two main devs, the difference in commits between them and even the next contributors is vast. This is normal and in other circumstances it’d grow organically, but considering the huge influx of users lately, which will likely take months to slow down, they just don’t have the same time to invest on this, and many things risk being neglected. I’m a sysadmin, haven’t coded anything big in at least a decade and a half beyond small helper scripts in Bash or Python, and haven’t ever touched Rust, so can’t help there, but maybe some of you Rust aficionados can give some time to help essentially all of Lemmy. The same can be said of Kbin of course, although that’s PHP, and there is exacerbated by it being just the single dev.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are some pretty serious bugs, though. One serious bug is that when a registration is denied, the applicant has no way of knowing, it doesn’t send an email like it does for approvals - you can find out more here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1096. Another serious bug is after rebooting, active/hot have trouble updating, which makes Lemmy appear much less active than it actually is: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3076

    These are just two serious bugs I know about, they are tier 0 bugs IMO, and I’m sure there’s even more serious bugs that are even more serious than these two.

    • Kresten@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll admit that those are serious issues. With that said, one of them is in progress of being solved by one of the maintainers and a volunteer instance host. But yes, it could use more people

    • jherazob@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s the ticket about clearing deleted messages after 30 days (right now it’s keeping every deleted message in the DB until account deletion which is bonkers to me), and i recall seen a couple other rather important ones when i was looking for one relevant to federation options (which i DID NOT find, and which would have prevented the defederation of those two instances). So yeah, there’s non-urgent tickets and duplicates and whatnot, but there’s important stuff too.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        With the clearing deleted messages after 30 days, I take it that would also delete the username viability after 30 days too, or would it still leave the username of the deleted comment even after 30 days?

        • jherazob@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That probably must be another ticket, this is specifically about it keeping the contents of deleted messages in it’s current state, which is not good.

      • s900mhz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting… lol didn’t know that. I feel like it should be configurable per instance

        • jherazob@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remember, Lemmy is RECENT, many things are still in development, that’s why i said that the Reddit shitstorm was bad timing, should’ve happened in a couple years or so :P