I really enjoyed all three books. They managed to do the galactic empire thing without getting overly bogged down in politics, and character development was interesting. I thought Leckie did a good job of conveying an extended AI in multiple bodies, and a solitary form (avoiding spoilers).

I read these not long after reading the first five Murderbot Diaries books, and I wonder if the Radch books might have been an influence on Wells. Some of the themes felt a little similar, while the stories were quite different.

Anyone read them? Liked it disliked, and why?

  • irdc@derp.foo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve read them too. I thoroughly enjoyed Justice, but had trouble finishing Mercy because it just failed to engage me.

      • irdc@derp.foo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I liked the concepts in Sword and Mercy though. The various species and their oddities and taboos, the technology, the characters. It’s just that somehow you can feel that Leckie didn’t have as much of a clear goal in mind where the story was going.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I actually wish they could have dwelled more on the final act of Mercy, with how the treaty played into it (avoiding spoilers). That concept itself was interesting, and all of the three books really played into it.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The conflict in Mercy wasn’t as anxious for me, but I did like it. And, unsurprisingly, it felt like more of an ending than the others (the three books really are like one continuous story in a lot of ways - more so than other series I’ve read).

  • solarvector@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I thoroughly enjoyed all three, although I agree with others that the second two were a little harder to get into.

    She did a good job of making the AI and science feel real. The character development and depth was also very good. It was easy to care about the characters, and many were likeable in their own way with real flaws, interests, and motives.

    The action may not have been the focus, but that was also a strong point where a character driven novel or series often struggles with that delivery.

    Overall, some of my favorite sci Fi.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve heard someone describe the background as “the most boring universe ever written”. I kind of agree when you get into the later two books. No clue why the second and third books got awards, they were painfully slow reading.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hmmm, I don’t think I agree with the criticism. The have been a lot of galactic empires written about, but I thought the notion of one emperor who is in a giant number of bodies, all in contact with each other, was pretty interesting.

      I don’t mind slower paced books. These weren’t super slow, kind of medium.