• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember the Reagan years. They absolutely sucked. I also voted for and was happy with Clinton. That said, in hind sight, Reagan set the house on fire, but the deregulation during the Clinton years threw a barrel of napalm into it to help it along. 1980-2000 is when we destroyed it all.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If Gore had won the presidency, things would have turned out very differently. And let’s not forget that things worked out quite well for a while under Clinton.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Same with Reagan (for some). When you rip out the brakes you get to go fast, which is great, until you need to turn or avoid a brick wall.

        The positive effects of deregulation are instantaneous, which is great for the current administration. The shit hitting the fan takes its time, which is bad for later administrations.

        EDIT: Gore did win. Never forget that.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m not old enough to have voted, but I remember the last few of the Reagan years, when his dementia was just as obvious as McConnell’s or Feinsten’s.

      Wilson started it, Roosevelt and Eisenhower propped it up, inadvertently or not, Nixon continued it, and Reagan paved the way for the shit we see today.

    • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Clintons also laid the groundwork for scaling up the prison population to boost slave labour and poors suppression.

      Something the republicans gladly inherited.