• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Pretty much the only way a new computing substrate will be developed is through massive government funding. No company will spend billions of dollars and years of research on something that may or may not pan out in the end. It’s just too much risk coupled with lack of short term profit. Meanwhile, the US has convinced Chinese government that they need to start doing precisely this kind of long term investment into computing tech, and now we’re seeing a huge amount of innovation coming out of China in this domain.

    • demunted@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed. Intel spent too much time swimming in their wads of cash and are paying the price now.

        • demunted@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Capitalism’s goal is not innovation is is about control and perpetually increasing revenue through that control.

      • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Intel was technologically cooked when the first AMD Athlon came out, architecturally, and business-wise. They should have kicked true r&d into high-gear and didn’t, really. The Core processors were something, but more of a nudge than something to stay relevant in the 21st century. If Apple can finally crack modems, Qualcomm will be next, although their mil/gov stuff may keep them in business as purely a contractor. Cisco is pretty close too, but they’re too skilled at acquisitions as a method to keep staying relevant.