The phrase “crossing the Rubicon” is an idiom that means “passing a point of no return”. Its meaning comes from allusion to the crossing of the river Rubicon from the north by Julius Caesar in early January 49 BC. The exact date is unknown. Scholars usually place it on the night of 10 and 11 January because of the speeds at which messengers could travel at that time. It is often asserted that Caesar’s crossing of the river precipitated Caesar’s civil war, but Caesar’s forces had already crossed into Italy and occupied Ariminum the previous day.
Caesar’s civil war (49–45 BC) was a civil war during the late Roman Republic between two factions led by Gaius Julius Caesar and Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Pompey). The main cause of the war was political tensions relating to Caesar’s place in the republic on his expected return to Rome on the expiration of his governorship in Gaul.
Before the war, Caesar had led an invasion of Gaul for almost ten years. A build-up of tensions starting in late 50 BC, with both Caesar and Pompey refusing to back down, led to the outbreak of civil war. Pompey and his allies induced the Senate to demand Caesar give up his provinces and armies in the opening days of 49 BC. Caesar refused and instead marched on Rome.
The war was fought in Italy, Illyria, Greece, Egypt, Africa, and Hispania. The decisive events occurred in Greece in 48 BC: Pompey defeated Caesar at the Battle of Dyrrhachium, but the subsequent larger Battle of Pharsalus was won by Caesar and Pompey’s army disintegrated. Many prominent supporters of Pompey (termed Pompeians) surrendered after the battle, such as Marcus Junius Brutus and Cicero. Others fought on, including Cato the Younger and Metellus Scipio. Pompey fled to Egypt, where he was assassinated upon arrival.
Caesar led a military expedition to Asia Minor before attacking North Africa, where he defeated Metellus Scipio in 46 BC at the Battle of Thapsus. Cato and Metellus Scipio killed themselves shortly thereafter. The following year, Caesar defeated the last of the Pompeians, at the Battle of Munda in Spain, who were led by his former lieutenant Labienus. Caesar was then made dictator perpetuo (“dictator in perpetuity” or “dictator for life”) by the Roman senate in 44 BC. He was assassinated by a group of senators (including Brutus) shortly thereafter.
The civil war is one of the commonly recognised endpoints of Rome’s republican government. Some scholars view the war as the proximate cause of the republic’s fall, due to its polarising interruption of normal republican government.[4] Caesar’s comprehensive victory followed by his immediate death left a power vacuum; over the following years his heir Octavian was eventually able to take complete control, forming the Roman Empire as Augustus.
Hexbear links
- 🐻Link to all Hexbear comms
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
- 👊 Share your gains and goals with your comrades in the New Weekly Improvement thread
- 🧡 Disabled comm megathread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
In the opening they first assumed the victim was a cis woman, then the main detective crouches next to her clothed body and immediately determines she’s not “physically female.”
Then we skip to after the autopsy and they ditch the possibility of the victim having been transgender due the body not having been transgender (???) and they just start referring to her as male.
There’s a whole plot where a pseudonymous author has been writing about their experiences as an underage sex worker. A shady literary agent wants to sell the movie rights to the book which requires him to have someone pretend to be the author at an event, so he hires a transgender sex worker off the street for the job.
Due to the ruse, the cops initially believe the victim to be the author. However, the actual author is an elderly man who was sexually abused when he was 12 at a youth center and who draws upon those experiences for the book.
I guess his pseudonymous author persona was also a trans woman, because why else would’ve the agent picked a trans woman to pose as them? But the elderly guy was a cis male who was abused as a boy
It’s just very confusing
so did the author kill the person posing as them?
what does it mean that the body isn’t transgender?
The victim was killed by one of her former johns for gay panic reasons. The killing ended up having nothing to do with the author switcheroo.
I have zero clue what the fuck Law & Order writers circa 2018 intended with that. Remember, at that point in the story the victim’s real identity wasn’t even known so I think they just had the cops assume their gender identity from a post mortem examination
do you remember what the episode was called?
Looks like it was called “Alta Kockers.” Let me know if I got something wrong, but I’m pretty sure how the victim’s gender identity was handled was at the very least iffy
Going to the surgeon to Alta my Kock
I’m just curious what this plot even is