ik that Biden isn’t re-running, but Kamala is basically the same from the macro pov

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    On a pragmatic level, what is your suggested course of action?

    I am not pragmatic about the chances of humans when it comes to not oppressing each other. They seem to do it in order to profit from the power imbalance.

    I’m just saying I don’t like it, and waiting to die.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yeah, well, some of us aren’t willing to give up just yet. Some of us are willing to reach for that slim chance that there is a way out. Some of us are trying to make things better, but like all political activism that has to follow some strategic approach.

      I didn’t hear many people complain about “both sides endorse genocide” until this election. Up to the primaries, pressuring your party to be anti-genocide is good and reasonable, and after the election is done, when the new government is being formed, pressuring it to be anti-genocide is critical, but right now, the strategic thing is to focus on things this election can change.

      That sudden upsurge of “both sides” rhetoric particularly in leftist spaces is concerning. Whether out of ignorance of how funding works, defeatism like yours or genuinely bad actors seeking to manipulate the election, it sabotages that pragmatic effort to keep the fascist out of office and buy time for more direct measures like protests, petitions, whatever else you want.

      “Both sides bad” may be true, but right now, it’s not helpful for leftist efforts.