Researchers found a flaw in a Kia web portal that let them track millions of cars, unlock doors, and start engines at will—the latest in a plague of web bugs that’s affected a dozen carmakers.

  • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oddly enough, the cars will be more secure used since all of those online features will be defunct and abandoned for newer, more “advanced” shitware in ten years.

    Continuing the tradition that buying used is always a good idea. Thank you, auto industry.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mmmm, all those expired domains with known vulnerable api clients still calling them…

      Imagine a botnet. Now, imagine a botnet on wheels!

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If the data isn’t being paid for anymore, they can’t connect to anything at all. Is T-Mobile or Verizon or whoever expected to foot the bill ten years down for no reason? There may be some definitions of connecting I’m missing, but I reasoned a data connection over some sort of cellular network.

        But then, if it’s some hidden proprietary magic on some unused bands, who knows?

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          I think it does use cellular. But theoretically, it could use a mesh network of all applicable cars that hops back to some entrance nodes into the manufacturer’s network or cheap exit nodes to the broader internet.

          Edit, autocorrect

          • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I imagine they’re still searching for the network despite not being able to reach anything, so maybe a local hack would be possible near the vehicle, but remotely? Idk.

            My personal strategy to avoid this situation is to just not buy a car with those “features”. If I can’t know before I buy it, then I won’t bother to care to know. Keep your secrets, I’ll keep my $.

            At some level, I’d put the blame of some of this on the consumer.

            Something being a scam on some level should be the inherent suspicion of basically everything you intend to purchase. The chances a product is straightforward and trustworthy seem to be far less likely these days than the opposite.