• EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    We were able to purchase this equipment by pulling from different funding sources which avoided any direct cost to our taxpayers.

    Uh huh, and exactly what might those sources be? It wouldn’t happen to be from bribes, would it? Or maybe civil asset forfeiture?

    • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Anything the police buy SHOULD be paid for by taxpayers, if they’re a ‘Public Service’ they should be paid with public money and like any other government job have any private funding be banned. If we’re gonna have a police force I’d rather it not be semi privatized.

      • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Absolutely correct. The reality is that the money they’re referring to was straight-up stolen from random civilians. Any time they say something wasn’t paid for by tax payers, that means it was funded entirely by civil asset forfeiture.

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          If it wasn’t it would have to be private donations and neither should be acceptable. The cops should have exactly what elected officials deem they should have.