Compare news coverage. Spot media bias. Avoid algorithms. Try GroundNews today and get 40% off your subscription by going to https://ground.news/huskTechnolo...
Pop science journalism is also frequently sensationalist garbage. In my own field where i am familiar with the subject matter i’d say they have a hit rate of maybe 50% where they actually write something good albeit boring for the average reader, and that’s mostly because the people writing have a real background in science. In other fields where the journalists are essentially amateur enthusiasts the ratio of decent pieces to garbage is even worse.
I am starting to consider whether or not the masses being conditioned to consoom is helping disingenuous “journalism” outlets like IGNorant and Faux News
Yeah. This is why I never trust journalists in general period with few exceptions.
Pop science journalism is also frequently sensationalist garbage. In my own field where i am familiar with the subject matter i’d say they have a hit rate of maybe 50% where they actually write something good albeit boring for the average reader, and that’s mostly because the people writing have a real background in science. In other fields where the journalists are essentially amateur enthusiasts the ratio of decent pieces to garbage is even worse.
I am starting to consider whether or not the masses being conditioned to consoom is helping disingenuous “journalism” outlets like IGNorant and Faux News