☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 months agoUS 15 years behind China in nuclear power – reportwww.power-technology.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1115arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-linkUS 15 years behind China in nuclear power – reportwww.power-technology.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square40fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarehuf [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 months agohow hard can it be? it’s basically bombing a reactor in reverse.
minus-squareroux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoYou’d think the US would be all about it then.
minus-squarehuf [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 months agoin reverse. so no, that’d be the SU. and anyway, bombing a reactor in reverse means you end up with a bomb and a reactor, and the US doesnt make things.
minus-squarePili [any, any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYou mean removing freedom from a reactor?! No thanks.
how hard can it be? it’s basically bombing a reactor in reverse.
You’d think the US would be all about it then.
in reverse. so no, that’d be the SU.
and anyway, bombing a reactor in reverse means you end up with a bomb and a reactor, and the US doesnt make things.
You mean removing freedom from a reactor?! No thanks.