• Spzi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Now we’re talking.

    I don’t agree with the “they don’t have a home so it’s ok that we took someone else’s and gave it to them” stance you seem to have.

    Yes, me neither. Glad we could clear this up. Personally, my favorite way forward after WW2 would have been to give them Bavaria, although this would have entailed other problems. Either way, we cannot reverse history and I think it’s important for the Jews to have their own nation. No, that’s not a free pass for things like this article.

    The compensation for persecution shouldn’t be allowing the victims to persecute others

    Obviously agreed. I think I already made that clear. But since we had this misunderstanding, it apparently was not so clear. So thanks for bringing it up, and using a few more words on it.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Forcibly taking land from a group of people who did nothing wrong to give it to another group of people is not OK, full stop.

      I think it’s important for the Jews to have their own nation.

      It’s not important for us to have our own nation at all because we are not a political party. Are we not able to live with other people?

      Let’s be clear about something: the nation of Israel and the Jewish people are two different things. Anyone who claims that their religion needs its own nation is not doing so in service of the religion or it’s people, they are fighting for their own political power.

      • Spzi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Forcibly taking land from a group of people who did nothing wrong to give it to another group of people is not OK, full stop.

        Yes, obviously.

        the nation of Israel and the Jewish people are two different things.

        Yes.

        Anyone who claims that their religion needs its own nation is not doing so in service of the religion or it’s people, they are fighting for their own political power.

        I feel that’s a bit too simplistic. ‘Jewish people’ can refer to religion, but also to culture, or descent. Neither of which have to overlap. Most importantly, it does not really matter how the individual identifies themselves to get into trouble for ‘being jewish’, but what others project onto this for their own political power.

        I’d be happy to cease this point and agree there is no necessity if we have, say, 200 years of no persecution. I agree it should be possible to live in multi-cultural peace without distinct nations, but I also recognize it wasn’t the case in the past. And I’m afraid it still isn’t the case in the present in many places.