• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    52·
    4 months ago

    You can’t have e2e encrypted anything without identifying information about unique users. Nothing reasonably secure anyway.

    • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      5·
      4 months ago

      SimpleX does it but is missing push-to-talk, no email, no phone number, no username or password, no sign up needed.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        2·
        4 months ago

        SimpleX still has devices as users, you just don’t see it. If you’re just talking about some random PTT voice chat or something, I haven’t seen anything.

        • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          1·
          4 months ago

          you just don’t see it.

          I want that with push-to-talk. Easier to get acquaintances and randoms to join, easy to spread.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        42·
        4 months ago

        You can’t have e2e encrypted anything without identifying information about unique users.

        SimpleX does it

        No, it doesn’t. It has IDs for unique users, but tries to mitigate the risks by keeping a separate set of IDs to use with each contact. (This is like having a separate Matrix/Jabber/Signal/whatever account for each contact.)

          • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
            22·
            4 months ago

            Okay, that clarifies what you want, but SimpleX still doesn’t do what @just_another_person said it can’t do. You seem to have misunderstood them.

            Also, what’s with the downvotes? Do you expect people to spend their time trying to help you when you respond like that?

            • Autonomous User@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
              11·
              4 months ago

              No offense, votes help sort comments and we’re moving off topic but your other comment is more useful, thanks again!