GoDaddy really lived up to its bad reputation and recently changed their API rules. The rules are simple: either you own 10 (or 50) domains, you pay $20/month, or you don’t get the API. I personally didn’t get any communication, and this broke my DDNS setup. I am clearly not the only one judging from what I found online. A company this big gating an API behind such a steep price… So I will repeat what many people said before me (being right): don’t. use. GoDaddy.

      • loudwhisper@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Desec.io is a good option. To be honest using cloudflare just for DNS is completely OK. It’s not a service that allows spying on you or consolidates their monopoly.

        • thejevans@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          It does, but for the same reason as what happened to OP, it’s best to separate DNS from domain registrar.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Don’t use DNS like that. Use a VPS and route traffic to a isolated network at home if need be

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          ?? Your solution to dynamic dns is to run all the traffic through a static IP vps? Are you paying for this VPS, or are you saying you trust the host more than you trust cloudflare, because they give you a free VPS?

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Safer is a matter of opinion. You’re moving your trust from one company to another, that doesn’t necessarily equate more safety. How do you trust the safety of companies?

              As for less fragile, that is patently untrue. You have all the same failure points as previous, but now must manage the update schedule of another server, and have the added reliance on a third party host. You’ve increased fragility if anything.