• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    there’s a difference between not having a unique style and physically being unable to have a style because you have next to no input in the process.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      Because mixed media does not exist.

      Nothing forbid anyone to train an AI with its own drawings in its own style.

      Once again, AI is a tool. Like many others used in digital art. It’s just a statistically driven generative algorithm. People can use a tool as they please to make art, same as they can use any other tool, and you have not the authority to gatekeep an artist of doing art just because you think their tool, their style, the object or anything about the artist does not fit with your morals.

      And they also can, and will, mix it with other tools to produce the piece of art they want to create.

      Also all this discussion about “the style™” could be just disproven given the fact that if you weight your variables and use a specific dataset you can generate consistent images in a determined style. And some AI artists does have a representative style due to this… So…

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        again, there are instances, like resampling, depending on the algorithm, where “AI” (misnomer) can be used as a tool.

        what people generally mean when they say “AI art” is not that.