• Xhieron@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Uh… okay, bro. You know that Donald Trump is also running in this election, right? Biden could be running single digits, and it still wouldn’t change the calculus: If a Biden alternative can’t beat Trump, they’re not going to put an albatross around the neck of their political career just to lose in November.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’ve got the entire thing backwards: Biden is the albatross.

      ANY other democrat polls better than Biden. Biden is the worst possible democrat to be running. Period. Except maybe Hillary, and even then, she’d be doing better than Biden right now.

      You swap out Biden with literally any hollow blue suit, and you are suddenly 10 points up in the polls.

      • Xhieron@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except there’s no such thing as a hollow blue suit! Any alternative to Biden has to be a real live human being, probably with real live political aspirations of their own. That means they’re going to want to win. Anybody who stands any chance of being anywhere remotely close to competitive also stands a chance of outright winning under better circumstances in four years.

        You’re asking an ambitious politician to take a real, serious risk of political suicide just to save face, and the reality is that no matter who your replacement is, polling better than Biden isn’t a win condition. Winning the election in November is the only good outcome. All other outcomes are bad not only for the nation but also personally for whoever replaces Biden.

        Sure, you can run a would-never-win-or-even-run-anyway candidate, but like I said: that’s essentially conceding the election, and Biden can do that on his own.