• MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You’re still not getting it lol. Neoclassical economics is theoretically standing out way over a cliff and simply refusing to look down like Wiley coyote. Your appeal to mathematics is unintentionally hilarious, because it was physics envy and the chasing of mathematical models over real life evidence/coherent theory that led the field astray to begin with lmao. You can come up with all kinds of fancy models and as much mathematics as you like, but none of it matters if you’re basing it on incorrect axioms.

    “Functioning in the real world” - oh yeah for sure. Burning the environment down and cooking the biosphere while forever chemicals and microplastics permanently saturate the ecosystem. Liberal societies are “Functioning” in so far as they’re not actively failed states this very moment, but that is accomplished on the back of neo-imperialism, unequal exchange with the global south, and unresolvable contradictions inherent to neo-liberalism/capitalism. A car driving 80 mph towards a cliff is working, sure, but is that a desirable state of affairs?

    Also take a quick look around my guy. We’re not in a laboratory. I’m calling you an idiot on the internet. Not every conversation is the platonic ideal of scientific pursuit you nerd.

    • gowan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And Im trying to remain a better class of person than you because you have demonstrated nothing other than that you are the exact type of uneducated person Im talking about. Your incapability to reason civilly or rationally will not help you even in the most utopian Marxist society.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk, if it was so plainly “false” and “uneducated” then it seems like it shouldn’t be that hard to provide a refutation of, especially since these are criticisms that even several liberal economists have been making for decades, e.g. “assume a can-opener” discourse.

        And he is talking about axioms, so you don’t even need to worry about correctly notating your fancylad mathematics.

      • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hear that @[email protected]? I’ve been a bad boy! Come frown at me for hurting the widdle wiberals feelings. He was just using elitism to disparage his interlocutors and maintain a worldview that harms people every day! Why did I have to go and be so uncivil! Whoa is me.

        Classic liberal. When confronted with arguments you don’t understand or have a retort to, you pearl clutch and complain about tone.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, Libs are like this everywhere. The self righteousness, the aggressive ignorance, the near absolutely inability to recognize their own limitations, the incuriousness. I think it’s mostly a consequence of living in a hegemonic cultural and media environment where they never encounter any meaningful challenges to their world view. Liberalism is all they know, and the only thing outside of it that they even casually encounter is fascism through the lens of Lib media venues, so they’re just completely unprepared to critique their own beliefs or situation.