• pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Every country that has nukes means more risk that some loose cannon sets off a nuke. That is why nuclear non-proliferation agreements are so important.

    To demonstrate, what if Saddam and Iran had had nukes during the Iran-Iraq War? Saddam used chemical weapons against the Kurds. Would he use nukes? I genuinely don’t know, the man was apparently a psychopath. Would you actually want someone like that to have nukes?

    • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Saddam used chemical weapons on Iran and the U.S. helped him. Would you actually want a country like that to have nukes?

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        No, I am arguing against nuclear proliferation. Especially a total psychopath like Saddam Hussein.

          • pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I have heard accounts from people who were in the presence of Saddam Hussein. He was a special type of psychopathic. You could feel you were in the presence of someone dangerous.

            • robinnn [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It’s like I’m talking to a character in Disco Elysium who has two preprogrammed responses and maybe a third if I forget to wear a shirt. Completely off in your own world huffing nasal spray.

              • pingveno@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                My sincerest apologies, comrade. You see, I indeed do have a sinus infection and the therapy has involved huffing Flonase.

      • pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Putin, as part of the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, said that if any countries tried to stop Russia, they would face “such consequences that you have never encountered in your history”. It’s hard to take that two ways.

        Also, much of the point isn’t who has threatened to use them. The more nuclear weapons material floating around, the more chance that it lands in the hands of someone with no compunctions about actually using it. The Doomsday Clock gets closer to midnight every time another country gets nukes.

        • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Maybe world leaders will finally be pushed towards diplomacy. As far as I see it, the region needs deterrence against foreign aggression. Just look at what Russia did to Ukraine after it gave up its nukes, or what the US did to Iraq and Libya. I don’t want that to happen to any other country in the region. Iran, Saudi Arabia and others all have a right to nuclear weapons. Israel already introduced them to the region and they are as fanatical and genocidal as any country can be.

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nukes are an inevitability following sanctions. North Korea was sanctioned to hell and back by major international players before they developed nukes… At that point, they really might as well go all the way. The same is true for Iran, and the same will be true for any upcoming player with nukes.

      The weaponization of sanctions for political gain rather than to act as a counterbalance against actual world-ending threats will be the death of us.