• Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They were years ahead of the curve with AI hardware, and they’re well placed to benefit from the AI craze.

    Regardless of whether a company’s AI product is useful, or profitable, they need lot of hardware to make it run.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      To illustrate your point, my old GPU, a GTX 1080 from 2016 (basically ancient history - Obama was still president back then) remains a very useful for ML-applications today - and this isn’t even their oldest card that is still relevant for AI. This card was never meant for this, but thanks to Nvidia investing into CUDA and CUDA being useful for all sorts of non-gaming applications, the API became a natural first choice when ML tools that run on consumer hardware started to get developed.

      My current GPU, an RTX 2080, is just two years younger and yet it’s so powerful (for everything I throw at it, including ML) that I won’t have to upgrade it for years to come.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Whatever makes RTX work is what accelerations a lot of AI tasks. I’d argue the 1080 is bordering on irrelevant if it wasn’t for the 8 gigs of ram to save it. The 2060 should be much faster despite for gaming being about in par.