• rio [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The incitement of public violence is explicitly makes Trump a fascist, to Paxton, and that’s entirely consistent with his book that you pretended to have read and means you were a dishonest hack to present this as though Paxton’s definition of exclusions and attributes is somehow some washy “fascism is a vibe” thing.

    That’s not his definition at all, he’s all about line drawing, and he likes bright lines.

    And citing books you haven’t read and then pretending to have read them and then saying “I proved I know what I’m talking about” when all you’re proving is that you haven’t read the book you pretended to have read is what makes you a fucking wanker and a hack.

    • CamillePagliacci [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t know how to respond to this except to say you’re just not arguing with anything I’ve said, and in the process you’ve said a lot of stuff that’s not true and quite obviously so?