• xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was right in the edge of Gen Z and Millennial and grew up being the family’s tech kid. It still astounds me now that my younger sisters don’t know how to even look for solutions. They just get me. Having moved out I get texts and calls sometimes. I’ve had to explain that using a computer is a skill that is learnable. I didn’t learn by going to someone else. I had to learn how to learn. That’s the skill we should be teaching kids. Not how to solve the problems, but how to FIND the solution to problems.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone also near the border between Gen Z and Millennial, I relate a lot to this comment. I was also the family tech kid, and since like middle school I’ve always told people “I’m not good with computers, I just know how to use a search engine”

      My “computer literacy” is literally just basic research skills; knowing how to formulate a web search and how to identify bad sources.

      • Millie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Right! This is why I say it has more to do with being stubborn than being smart. If you’re determined to find a solution and you’re half decent at research and following instructions, you can figure a lot out, but people treat it like you invented the thing with some magical knowledge that they could never possess.

        • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’ve just articulated a feeling I’ve had most of my life, but couldn’t have described better.

          Solving trivial problems for people they could easily do themselves if they just muddled through the work of it. Then act like I’m a genius, when it’s really just ‘stubbornness’ and refusing to admit i can’t figure it out.

          Thanks for that.

      • flashmedallion@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On this subject, my personal definition for millennial is someone in the age bracket where they had to teach themselves how to use windows as a kid

      • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the issue that is the most baffling to me. Learning how to search properly can be done in 10 minutes but no one does it.

        If I want a recipe for a burger with onions, I’ll search for “recipe burger with onions.” When people around me search for the same recipe, they would type “I’m hungry and I’d like stuff with onions and shit” and instead of getting one of the billion web sites with recipes, they would stumble upon a weird blog about an anorexic girl who is obsessed with onions, and think that the internet contain no recipes at all.

    • gammasfor@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we can blame the education system. At some point it became solely about passing some arbitrary threshold of students with high exam scores rather than about teaching students how to get by in life.

      End result was an education system that simply teaches kids how to pass exams rather than basic life skills like critical thinking.

      • fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also blame the education system, the fact that my computer teacher thought that opening R, trying to reconnect to WiFi, and opening the cmd prompt were all attempts at “hacking” is sad. The fact our robotics class shut down when the exchange student left, because he was the only who knew how to program was sadder.

        Part of the problem is the people making the standards don’t even know how ignorant they are themselves. Like I at least recognize I have a lot learning to go, and lean heavily on people more experienced than me in fields I’m not the expert.

      • Cybersteel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ones that is blamed for the ills of society by both the baby boomers and younger gen zs

        • Aradina [She/They]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep. I was born 1998. To Millennials, I’m a tiny baby Gen Z, to Gen Zs, I may as well be a boomer. It’s odd.

          Growing up poor confuses things even more, because I have more in common with people born late 80s/early 90s than with people born only a few years after me. My first game console was a SNES and we had a VCR until we got a PS2, and kept using it well after.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Growing up poor confuses things even more

            Yeah this is why generations aren’t actually a good metric. I might as well be from another planet lol

          • Flicsmo@rammy.site
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hah, are we the same person? My family was poor too. I’m a bit younger (born 2000) but I grew up using a VCR, and my first console was a GBA where I played a lot of SNES ports. The internet has existed my entire life, but I still remember before smartphones were a thing. It’s a really weird place to be socially. I don’t connect with Gen Z culture in almost any way, but I’m also distinctly not a millennial.

            Interestingly my older sister (1998) who has zero interest in anything tech is actually pretty tech savvy for how little she cares about it. I think she crossed that threshold of learning how to learn, where even when she comes across something she doesn’t understand she knows how to approach the problem.

            • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              95 here. Started with the original GameBoy and an old Macintosh in the basement. My first computer was a POS gateway with the cow logo and 128MB of RAM. Finished up high school with the Xbox 360 and an iPhone. I’m a retrogrouch to Gen Z and some kind of hacker to most Millenials. My GF (same age) and I jokingly call ourselves “MillenialZ” (with an obnoxious accentuated zzzzzz at the end) because we don’t quite fit in with either generation.

          • pitl@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same boat here, though a couple years later. It feels really weird to be so out of the loop with my “fellow” Gen Z siblings who were born in the late 00s.

    • Veloxization@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m also between gen Z and millennial and was the family’s tech kid and still get calls. Are you me? :D

      Just yesterday I got a call asking how to select all images in a directory… And then another call about how to get those images to Google Drive, which is literally just drag and drop… And one of the people involved was my gen Z younger sister.

      • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the family’s tech kid and still get calls

        I don’t know how you all get calls. I have literally never been called to fix a computer. People prefer to pay some random guy at Walmart who will scam them, instead of calling me and getting free help. And I’m not a troll, not an asshole, or an incel, I’m a regular guy, I’m friendly, but people don’t seem to care, they prefer paying for useless help.

        • Veloxization@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course my family members call me. It’s the only way they get the tech support I used to offer in-house. :D

    • Superfly Samurai@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Teach a child to fish, basically.

      If we keep making it easy for them… Ask and I’ll give you all the answers… They’ll never learn.

      My first response these days is, “What have you tried so far?” And, “What are you searching for in ‘Google’?”

      • transmatrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also ask “what have you tried so far” mostly because too many times I get into troubleshooting and then discover that they’ve created a new problem while doing their own troubleshooting. (Like one time they plugged in a second cable between two switches - good god was that hard to troubleshoot remotely)

    • fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every one learns something for the first time. Expert to noob all start in the same state of knowing nothing.

    • TheInternetCanBeNice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m going to go a bit further and say that kids today are not worse than in the past. It’s been 20 years since I taught computers but the doom and gloom here could have easily been posted in 2002 with only minor rewording.

      GUIs got good with the launch of the Mac in 1984, and by the launch of XP & Mac OS X in ‘01 good GUIs were cheap. This brought computers into way more homes and exposed them both to kids who liked them for their own sake and to kids who saw them primarily as a tool.

      I think people like this handwringing about kids not understanding computers on a deep enough level for their taste are just being obtuse.

      I write software now instead of teaching and I write the kind of software that people should be able to just use as a tool.

      We’ve had 20 years where the vast majority of computer users understand latin better than they understand their computers. It’s fine. It’ll continue to be fine.

  • ion@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man, I didn’t realize that article was written in 2013, it could’ve been written today, and it still would’ve been true. I think one of the biggest contributions to the tech illiteracy of people is, 1. Schools don’t really teach you about that kind of stuff (in my experience, or unless you take a special course) and 2. Everything is basically done for you now, its incredibly easy to do anything basic on computers.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So when the author says it’s the 30-50 year olds that know how to use computers, today it’s the 40-60 year olds. I’d say it goes older than that.

      One thing that used to bug me on reddit was youngsters going on about how over-50s wouldn’t know how to use a computer. That hasn’t been the case for decades now.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s actually the 8-80 year olds that don’t know how to use computers.

        Most people don’t know. They just know how to use a handful of programs. But the vast majority of them don’t understand the basic concepts behind them. Things like files and directories are nebulous at best.

        Does it matter? A little, because so much stuff revolves around computers nowadays. Which means that they don’t really understand the world they’re navigating daily. OTOH, they live perfectly well as they are, so it clearly doesn’t matter to them.

      • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hear hear! We 40-50+ year old geeks were learning the Internet as it rolled out. Before that we were upgrading our PCs and modems as funds permitted, joining & running BBS’s on DOS. OS/2 seemed futuristic and I ran it for a while, but Linux won my heart. As a teenager, I had my favourite kernel hackers, tested their patches, chatted with them on IRC. Before that, we had our C64s, Amiga 500s and similar. We had the greatest opportunity to learn, and we loved it.

        Over the last 10 years I’ve really had to dumb down my interview questions, covering a wider range of topics until I (hopefully) find a spark of passion and beyond-user-level knowledge about anything (even unrelated to the position)… it used to be easier.

        • fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like getting into opensource software is easier than it ever was at least, the biggest Barrie’s I see are people thinking they can’t and advertising making people defensive about sticking to proprietary options.

    • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still remember getting in trouble at my public school with the IT admin because my friends and I discovered how to write BAT files, and had the brilliant idea to create a bunch of fork bombs that self-replicated until they froze their host computer.

      Unfortunately I think kids today don’t even get enough leeway to figure that sort of shit out. But kids are awfully good at finding cracks in systems, so maybe they’ve just figured out how to get up to similar hijinks with GUIs and cloud storage.

    • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Teaching direct tech through schools is problematic too because by the time they update the cirriculum the reality had changed. Concepts and diagnositcs would be a lot more useful, then let the kids have the tools to find the issues from there

  • garwalut@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was showing an intern how to install a software the intern needed. The computer setup was a laptop with two external monitors. After we installed the software from one of the external monitors, the intern asked “so will this install the software in the other screen?” I was flabbergasted.

  • Superfly Samurai@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pushing 50 and when people ask me how I know so much about computers, my first comment is that I had to program my first computer for it to do anything.

    My second is that I actively sought to learn, and you can too.

    Later in life Linux played a huge role in understanding how these contraptions work. Ironically, I’m a human factors engineer, so I’m also guilty of creating part of the problem. User interfaces that “just work”… Until they don’t.

    • Sir_Kevin@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had to program my first computer for it to do anything.

      Sadly, most people have no grasp what that even means. I’ve had adults think that means I “downloaded something into the computer” and then it worked.

      It was around that time I just stopped talking to anyone outside of my geek circle about anything technical. Best to play dumb.

      • fruitywelsh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I realized I started to sound snarky when I said “I work on computers” when people ask me what I do. Didn’t mean it to sound dumb, it was just honestly the level of understanding about computers a lot strangers had when they asked.

        Saying I did networking or worked with servers didn’t mean much, but sometimes people would ask me to work on their WiFi…

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am 28 and i have always thought that the as long as you know how to operate a search engine you can find out what you need. The reason computer people know computers better than you do is because computer people can use a search engine better than you

      • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I use searx and DNS level adblocking. Online ads are almost a completely foreign concept for me as 99.9% of the time they just never even load.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I remember when Google used to be perfectly functional as long as you knew the right search tools. Now it thinks it knows what I’m searching for better than I do, and that almost always means pointing me towards something someone paid for lol

          • Alkider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is advanced searching any better? I wouldn’t know now because searx but when I used it before it helped to keep the results focused.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s better, but sometimes google will decide you didn’t really mean to type the string inside the quotation marks. Advanced search tools used to be rock solid!

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            God help you if whatever you’re searching for has key words in any way related to a big news story. Even trying to restrict the date doesn’t seem to help.

    • Chaos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I learned how to use computer since i was 5 years old, mostly through video games, then by playing with the Microsoft office, i’m 25 now going computer engineering, and i’m teaching my dad how to use a computer lol

    • rockerface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly this. I am 27 and if there’s anything I’ve learned about the importance of different skills in tech, is that the most important one is finding the information you need. Everything else, you can look up as you need it

    • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And he thinks TL;DRs are for kids with ADHD. Totally egotistic. I’m sure his whole point can be heavily TL;DR’d.

      • Flicsmo@rammy.site
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        And after that he goes directly into a tedious story that does more to make me dislike him than actually build up the point he’s trying to make. I agree with the basic premise of the article, but the endless passive aggressive anecdotes really don’t help.

        • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The whole attitude just ruined it for me. He went full “get ready to hear this 2h long story about my times and how awful current generations are. And no, you’re not allowed to go to the bathroom while I talk” grandpa style.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Twitter brain rot is a problem that effects all ages, but then you grow up with it, it’s worst.

        • pazukaza@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think sometimes people just want others to go straight to the point. I don’t want to hear the personal stories of this guy, just rambling about his past and his skills.

          Maybe he could say the premise and a conclusion. Then explain why he reached that conclusion. But no, he chose to torture you with personal anecdotes to get to a point he could have summarized in a few words.

    • transmatrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks like they haven’t really posted to the site since 2014 (there was a post in 2017, but they were no other posts between then and 2014.) LetsEncrypt wasn’t nearly as prolific back then.

  • BrianTheFirst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how everyone is acting like this is a new thing. People have never been able to use computers.

    • Tak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This article looks like it is seriously a decade or older at this point. The writer goes on about how phones can’t be upgraded or repaired and go obsolete in two years but also buys a macbook pro.

      Much of the article is some boomer going on about how they had no computers and they know computers better than people who do have computers. But I bet you this guy doesn’t know how to make laundry detergent but they rely on it all the time. Bet you need manufactur-dad to the fucking rescue for you eh?

      • The Grunkler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article was posted in 2013. It is exactly a decade old. And kids still cant use computers today

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They know how to use computers much better than when I was a kid. Ultimately I feel we fixate on every kid knowing computers at some enthusiast level for no reason.

          Life is often about being just good enough to get by and we don’t fixate on kids knowing other parts of their lives. Cars are a great example because most people take their car into a tire shop instead of doing it themselves. Most people buy food instead of growing or butchering it themselves.

          • treadful@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ultimately I feel we fixate on every kid knowing computers at some enthusiast level for no reason.

            Calling a level of knowledge “enthusiast” is super subjective and I think the author is arguing that bar should be higher. Being able to “use” a computer (IMO and the author’s) should include things like connecting it to a network, reading error messages, following basic instructions, and knowing what basic hardware components do.

            Cars are a great example because most people take their car into a tire shop instead of doing it themselves.

            Drivers should know how to deal with a flat and check their oil. A lot of people don’t, but they should.

            Most people buy food instead of growing or butchering it themselves.

            People should know how to cook a decent meal from ingredients. A lot of people don’t, but they should.

            All the users that say shit like “make it work” for tools they use every day of their lives are under-educated IMO and should want to learn more about those tools and develop their skills further to make their daily lives easier. I don’t really get why people don’t.

            • Tak@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with all of your reasoning here that people should be more knowledgeable about what they use and rely on.

              Being able to “use” a computer (IMO and the author’s) should include things like connecting it to a network, reading error messages, following basic instructions, and knowing what basic hardware components do

              I guess maybe I come from a perspective on computers that this is ultimately optimistic and not real. Connecting to a network can mean so many things depending on the network involved and in some instances needs you to know your MAC address. While on Android now you can share wifi network credentials with a QR code now.

              Yes, I want people to be more knowledgeable but I don’t know how to make sure people are. People come out of more than a decade of education thinking the world is flat and that capitalism breeds innovation. (For clarity I believe that capitalism only breeds innovation in extracting profit and the world is an oblate spheroid.)

      • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like he addresses this quite well in the conclusion. In regards to cars, “this is not a new phenomenon” and admits to his reliance on salesmen and mechanics.

        Ultimately, he’s asking that the people who make decisions about how our world is shaped have some knowledge about the things that are going to shape the world. And that essential issue is still unaddressed. Remind me, how many years ago was it that US Congress was asking Google why the bad articles show up when you search their name?

        Oh, and our car-centric society in the US largely sucks. That may or may not have anything to do with our general understanding of a motor, but maybe it’s worth considering how much thought has really gone into the implications of these massively affecting technologies.

        • Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re not likely to educate people on a torque converter just like you’re not likely to educate people on subnet masking.

  • Invishiro@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    My wife and I were just talking about this the other day.
    I’m not in IT but I work as an industrial maintenance electrician, and knowing how computers work solves more problems than people realize!

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so frustrating when people are like “Well I don’t need to know how computers work.”

      Every aspect of our lives is governed by computers in one way or another. I can’t imagine not being curious to know how they work.

      • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        People feel the same way about cars, electricity, food preservation. People’s lives are interdependent on massively specialized technical disciplines and most of them couldn’t care less. I understand that the amount of specialization that goes into some topics means you can’t be an expert on all of these subjects, but some people just could not give a single shit how any of it works, and do not have any understanding of the ways in which it might stop working.

        I’ve come to greatly resent any sort of technology or design being dismissed as “magic”, because I’ve met too many people who mean it literally.

        • kakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely. I’ll be the first to admit my knowledge of cars is lacking, but that doesn’t mean I’m not interested in learning about it. It’s fine to not know things, but it’s weird to not want to know things.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I like to think I have the general gist of how cars work and go together, even if I couldn’t literally get in one and replace some arbitrary part (other than tires/batteries/fluids) without a lot of guides.

            • kakes@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I feel like I know all the very specific stuff from watching videos about how 4-stroke engines and such work, but the moment I open my actual-for-real hood I’m mostly clueless outside of very basic maintenance.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Unscrew things in the right order and swear at how everything is completely rusted in place.

              There, easy.

          • cyanarchy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, and I’m sure you’ll agree there’s a gap between “my car is a machine that occasionally requires service by someone who knows how” and “my car is a metal horse that should go as long as I put gas in it”. I don’t expect people to be the mechanic, but the second group of people is very much real.

            • LegionEris@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              my car is a metal horse that should go as long as I put gas in it

              This one is fun because horses require so much more effort and upkeep than cars. Your horse can suck because you made it sad.

    • Dalimey@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I giggled at that too, especially when combined with the blogger’s quote “Ask them what https means and why it is important and they’ll look at you as if you’re speaking Klingon.”

    • nutel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, your comment just shows your tech illiteracy. https is useless when you don’t need to deal with sensitive data.

      • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s definitely not the case that it’s useless. A MITM can embed malware into the page it returns if you aren’t being served over HTTPS. It’s not just about snooping on sensitive data going one or both ways, it’s about being sure that what you’re receiving is from who you actually think you’re receiving it from.

        (Edit to add:) I actually went to look at some of the rest of the site and it confirms what I suspected: not using HTTPS here puts the reader at risk. Because this website provides code snippets and command line snippets that the user is to run, by not presenting it over HTTPS, it becomes susceptible to malicious MITM editing of the content.

        For example, this line on the site:

        1. Install Homebrew (ruby -e “$(curl -fsSL https://raw.github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/go/install)”)

        Could be intercepted, since it’s not being served HTTPS, and be replaced with utf-8 lookalike characters that really downloads and runs a malicious ruby script! Even easier, perhaps, they could just insert an item into the bulleted list that has the user run a malicious command.

        HTTPS is not just for security of personal or private information. It is also for verifiable authenticity and security in contexts like this.

          • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Indeed. See my edit on the parent comment–I noticed that the website provides commands to the user to run, which makes it ripe for MITM attacks: if the user is copying-and-pasting commands to run into their shell, those need to be served over HTTPS.

  • dewritoninja@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im a 6th semester software engineer student, back in first semester I had classmates that didn’t even know how to zip a folder

    • Deepus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ive worked with a few people that had completed CS degrees that couldnt do basic troubleshooting. One of them still works for my old employer and ive been informed that hes still as bad as the first day they hired him!

    • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was there to learn, right? Is a first semester student expected to know specific programs without explanation?

      • dewritoninja@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Zipping a folder is on of the most basic features of any os. It’s weird that he was so unfamiliar with computers and decided to get into compsci

        • Cortell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s what happens when everyone says it’s a moneymaker. Most of them transfer out of the program after first year

        • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Zipping a folder has 0 to do with compsci in the first place. Unless it’s a course on compression.

          • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I disagree. You should study computer sciences because you’re a geek and want to know more. Knowing how to right-click and select “Create ZIP from directory” is the most basic feature ever. When I started my compsci courses, I had friends who already knew C++ or were compiling their own kernel of this brand new thing called “Linux.”

            • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you should only major in things you already know?

              Any decent compsci program starts out assuming the student knows nothing.

              Besides computer science is about math, not actually interacting with a specific os.

  • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They even know how to use Word and PowerPoint and Excel

    Oh how poorly has this sentence aged in the last 10 years. There’s another nice article about this phenomenom of kids not understanding folder structure here.

    Back in uni I was the smart guy whom everyone would ask for help, both with tech and non-tech issues:

    “Hey nudny ekscentryk, my phone won’t connect to the campus WiFi”. Oh yeah that happens I said, you probably didn’t fill in the login credentials correctly. This was actually rather tricky, because it used [email protected] for logging in and required changing the default password at least once since registering, for database reasons I guess. They tried it, didn’t work. Are you sure you know your password? No, they don’t. Let’s check in their password manager. They have an iPhone, which I haven’t used since I indefinitely switched to Android a couple years back. Took me 20 seconds to find the password manager in Settings though. The password is not there. “Oh you mean my university password? It’s in my notes”. We go to Notes app. There’s nothing here, do you use Evernote or something else entirely for that?. They use a fucking Google Docs document for notes. It’s not very handy is it? Like you have to zoom in to edit, it’s all clumsy because it’s a document and the text’s formatted weirdly. Not a problem to them, because “well at least it syncs so I can access it from my iPad.” Okay, whatever. It’s not like your built-in iOS password manager doesn’t sync. We managed to connect to the WiFi network. “could you also do that for the WiFi in the other building?”. But it’s the same network, it will connect automatically to either. They know better: “nah it can’t be, the range is too far”. I explain it’s not the same hotspot but the credentials are shared and in fact since it’s eduroam, a global network, it will work in pretty much any university campus in the world automatically. “wow that is crazy, will that also work for my iPad”. Well if you log in with the same credentials. “could you do it for me? i’ll fetch my iPad”. No, I’ve shown you how to do it, you can do it yourself now. They can’t use a computer.

    A different time I was proofreading a classmate’s thesis, see quadruple x’s next to each heading. hey, what’s up with these? I ask her, she replies: “oh I put them here so I can easily find each heading when formatting text. If I make any changes I can just search for <xxxx>” and it will automatically let me go through all headings easily without scrolling manually :)". I open the Navigator (I use LO Writer) and it’s empty. She wrote an 80-page document without ever using Styles. All headings, title page etc. were formatted manually. I enable the Formatting Marks. Holy shit. She uses spaces and tabs to move text around. Loads of line breaks to move text to the next page. I could tell the document looks off but I never though this was due to so poor editing skills. Or rather lack thereof. You know you’re doing everything the hard way here?. “What do you mean?”. There are tools for all that you’ve done here. Like you can use Styles to mark headings and then edit them in bulk. You can add automatic numbering, which will later let you create an index within a second. To move next to the next page you can use page breaks. “Okay cool but this is how I do it”. Alright, then you are just giving yourself extra work, what’s the point of not doing this correctly once and then never bothering with formatting ever again?. “Could you do it for me?”. I can show you all these tools but I won’t be doing that for you, as I’m already proofreading your paper factually. “Okay whatever”. Guess what, she never bothered and when handing it the finished paper (probably around 120 pages), her instructor made her do it anyway. She asked me to help her with that. I said no, because I offered help before and she didn’t bother. After submitting the paper, the reviewer returned it and made her re-do all citations in an, at least, consecutive style. “Oh fuck that guy why would he give me so much work!? You know how many hours it took me to insert all these in here.”. It was around 280 citations total, out of 30 different pieces of writing. She obviously did all of them manually by typing out footnotes. You know there are bibliography managers which do it automatically in a consecutive style for you?. “Will it automatically fix what he asks?”. Well, no, because (again) you originally did it incorrectly. This one issue was even stranger for me than her not using styles for formatting: one year later we both attended a “methodology of scientific publishing” class, where they introduced us to Google Scholar, Zotero, Impact Factor and other stuff she could use now. We even had a take-home project to create a bibliography in Zotero and she did it (with online help). But she didn’t bother to retain it in her skillset, so when needing to actually apply that skill, she wasn’t even aware this was exactly what she learned a year earlier. Crazy; she can’t use a computer.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      https://xkcd.com/763/

      But forreal, I think it’s really interesting how people who aren’t familiar with computers never think to themselves, “there has to be a better way to do this.”

      Like, I’m an EE, and electrical engineering software is notoriously terrible (I like to joke it’s because it’s written by EEs). Even knowing that, if I run into a problem where I want to accomplish something where the default option is to click and drag something 200 times, the first thing I do is google “how do thing Altium.” Sometimes the answer really is to do it the hard way, but I at least check first.

      Edit: I’m just remembering a story where I was asked to review a PCB and schematic design for a client. I think they had hired like someone’s kid to do the design work to save money as there were problems all over the place.

      Probably the most glaring was with the component markers or “reference designators.” In Eagle CAD, when you place a component (resistor, chip, etc), it comes with a little label to be printed on the PCB. This label has a default location next to the part and moves with the part, but you can’t move it relative to the part without using a separate tool to allow that. This is important when designs get dense as labels might overlap each other or other parts.

      Any way, rather than searching for how to move reference designators relative to components (it’s called the “Smash” tool), this kid deleted all reference designators from the design and just manually placed labels. That means that when you move a component, you have to manually move the label. Also, normally, reference designators are hi-lighted when you select components so you know which one goes with which component. These manual labels had no association with the parts. The only way to tell if a label was next to the right part was to select the component to figure out its name, and then visually scan the labels to look for the one with a matching name.

      There were hundreds of parts on the PCB. This was $1500 software, and they assumed that this was the correct user flow. Place parts, delete labels linked to parts, make new labels not linked to parts.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s really interesting how people who aren’t familiar with computers never think to themselves, “there has to be a better way to do this.”

        Sort of a communal learned helplessness. Years of abusive user interfaces and faceless corporations providing an all or nothing platform instead of modular tools leads to a mindset of “that’s just the way it is and I have to deal with it”.

    • folshost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Off topic here, but do you speak a slavic language? Your username means boring eccentric right? I speak some Czech (am American) and I definitely miss the Czech subreddit

    • Zangoose@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a current computer science college student who was a TA for 2 semesters, can confirm… It’s wild out here

      • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It amazes me the sheer number of developers whose hands I need to hold for even the most basic tasks that my elderly mother even knows how to do. I’ve worked in tech for about 15 years, and the terms “developer” and “tech nerd/enthusiast” used to be synonymous, but over the years, that’s less and less true.

        The tech nerds use to be the ones getting CS degrees. Now it seems like it’s just another degree for indecisive majors and most of the kids I see starting out today aren’t passionate about tech - it’s just a degree/paycheck. It’s just baffling to me lol. I work in support, and most folks on my end are big tech nerds still.

        • nodsocket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, there is a noticeable difference between those who went into tech for $$$ and those who are passionate about it.

    • tycho@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read the (original?) article on the Verge covering this and my understanding is that it’s not an issue. The files/folders way of thinking is already a metaphor for 0s and 1s scattered around on silicon. Using a “laundry basket with a search robot” isn’t inherently a worse way to store data than a “file system with hierarchy”.

      We are just used to one way and the other baffles us because it goes against our way of thinking about 0s and 1s scattered on silicon.

      • happyhippo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well TBH I’m STILL waiting for a nice tag-based file system where I can just throw all my files in my bin and filter by tags, potentially more than one at a time.

      • sparr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using a “laundry basket with a search robot” IS inherently a worse way to store data than a “file system with hierarchy”.

        Nested folders are reliable and predictable.

        Tagging is also a good option.

        Relying on search that is likely to fail in predictable ways is an awful way to do anything serious. And therein lies the problem… These people have mostly never done serious work with a computer before, that other people rely on. As soon as someone else stands to lose money or fail a class because you can’t find a file, the distinction will come into sharp focus.

      • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is the laundry basket is not one laundry basket, but a series of subtly different ones that are all poorly implemented leaky abstractions layered on top of files.

  • root@socialmedia.fail
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Computers, math, cooking, cleaning, exercise, eating properly.

    It’s just another in a long list of things that some grown-ass adults act like is somehow beyond them because that’s easier than trying.

    Definitely not unique to any generation.

      • root@socialmedia.fail
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol it’s really not, at all. every generation tells themselves this and it’s always bullshit.

        The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.

        • Attributed to Socrates, ~400 BC
        • eleitl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are objective metrics one can use, rather than basing your opinion on your personal observation window.

    • BrianTheFirst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      easier than trying

      I’m sure there are plenty of cases of this, but I feel the need to point out that a lot of times there can be mental illness at the root. Which is definitely not easier than trying.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just another in a long list of things that some grown-ass adults act like is somehow beyond them because that’s easier than trying.

      That’s the funny part. It’s not really easier. They have to go through life depending on others to do trivial things for them.

      Imagine taking your car to a mechanic for low tire pressure rather than learning how to use the pumps at a gas station.