A Swiss International Air Lines plane arrived at its destination without a single checked bag onboard.

The plane arrived in Bilbao, Spain, on Saturday without any of the passengers’ checked bags. The bags were left behind in Zurich, Switzerland, Kavin Ampalam, a spokesperson for Swiss, told the news agency AFP.

Passengers waited in vain for more than two hours at a conveyor belt for their suitcases, according to the Swiss-German newspaper The Blick.

“There was a shortage of ground staff,” Ampalam told AFP. Ampalam said the flight departed without its 111 passengers’ suitcases “for operational reasons,” as the plane had to fly another set of passengers from Bilbao to Zurich Airport before it closed. Swiss was operating the flight on behalf of Edelweiss Air, Ampalam said.

Ampalam said the flight crew waited for “one hour and 16 minutes” for the ground staff to load the bags onto the plane before deciding to fly to Bilbao without them.

“We understand the situation is not favourable for the people involved, and of course we regret the inconvenience,” Ampalam told AFP.

Several passengers said the pilot in charge of the flight was apologetic over the delayed departure, but never mentioned leaving their bags in Zurich, according to Blick’s report.

  • maporita@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is what bugs me more than anything. They “know” my bag didn’t make the flight but instead of sending me a message (to the email / phone number I already gave them) they make me wait two hours on the ground after a one hour flight.

    • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Forget the contact details, captian could have informed it at any point during the flight but nope, can’t cause any problems that may affect their schedule.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The actual right response should have been not to depart. Or cancel the flight. What are 111 passengers going to do without their luggage at the destination?!

        • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s not entirely fair. I would rather arrive at my location without luggage than not at all. I can always get some cheap shirts and shorts or whatever at my destination. I can’t get my hotel, and other prepaid scheduled expenses fees back.

          • sudo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            ·
            10 months ago

            Which just reiterates the initial point, communication solves this.

            ‘hey guys, so, basically we can’t get your bags on the plane lolol wanna still go? Stay on the plane. Umad? Get off and get a refund’

            Wow. Hard stuff.

            • XTornado@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The issue with that, is that would cause more delays so them not telling people before departure makes sense. Not telling them on arrival is stupid.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Sure. But that’s you. And probably me. But we don’t represent all possible, legitimate scenarios.

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Read the article if they had not taken off at that time they wouldn’t have made the return flight in time (Zurich airport has no landings past midnight). So not flying means that 111 people would not make it to Bilbao (without their bags) and a similar amount of people wouldn’t make it to Zurich (with their bags).

          Personally, I would rather take the flight and get my bag a day or two later. Annoying af yes but at least you get some compensation to get some clothes.

          If half the people are flying home it’s not even that big of a problem.

          • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I agree, but I think it would be better to inform the passengers and give them a chance to alight.

            The problem there is that those passengers would demand a replacement flight or a refund, and we can’t have that, can we?

            • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Of course, informing them before take off would have been ever better. But then the plane still needs to fly, even if empty.

              And the passengers can still get compensation, maybe even more than the refund of the flight so I’m sure that for many of the passengers this was the better deal.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The crew fucking knew… like I kind of understand not saying it on the plane as some people might react badly or whatever but at least when they are on destination at least inform them…

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly. If they’d have just said outright “look, we fucked up, your bags aren’t here, go to your hotels, and we’ll have them sent on tomorrow”, people would have been annoyed but could at least have enjoyed their holidays.

      The complete lack of communication from transport companies is beyond maddening. And it’s the same everywhere. When my train is “delayed”, I’ve no idea if that’s 5 minutes away or if it’s an inferno lying on its side on an embankment. The automated announcements will be the same either way.

    • quicken@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The one time I had a bag left behind I was flying into Narita airport in Japan. At the luggage carousel there was a person holding a sign with my name on it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Checking bags is bullshit.

      Let some high school dropout from the TSA search your bags while you get foot fungus.

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The TSA is in the USA only. The TSA is an American government department. They do not exist in Switzerland or Spain, two countries which are not the USA.

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    10 months ago

    There is no such thing as a labor shortage. There is only a wage shortage caused by the airline. Stop pushing costs down to the point you can’t operate, you twats.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I clearly missed the memo where the world news need to be important and not just news from around the world like idk it says on the about part of the subreddit.

      Maybe you should create /c/importantworldnews or something instead of complaining.

  • ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    All it would take is a little COMMUNICATION and it wouldn’t be an unacceptable situation, but here we are.

    • Syldon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Someone has actually closed that baggage door knowing that there was not a single suitcase in there.

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Circumstances like this are why I fly with only 1 small carry-on. I’m too paranoid to ever check a bag and haven’t in over a decade.

  • Poiar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is why we need more high speed trains. Can’t forget your luggage when you have it with you at all times

    • IndefiniteBen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And they are being built and encouraged in Europe. I’d recommend anyone travelling within Europe first check for train routes before booking a flight.

      That said, while they are improving the situation, building new rail lines, tunnels, bridges, etc., and changing the regulatory environment to allow more competition, these are slow improvements to make.

      I checked and Zurich-Bilbao has few high-speed sections. They’re building new high speed lines near Bilbao, but infrastructure takes time…

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Several passengers said the pilot in charge of the flight was apologetic over the delayed departure, but never mentioned leaving their bags in Zurich, according to Blick’s report.

    Yeah… that really sucks probably a good call on the pilots part to be honest.

    • MrsDoyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s novel. One bag left behind isn’t news (looking at you Lufthansa you bastards); all the bags left is new, therefore news.

      • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        if you’re definition of news is “this could be featured on the local news to fill in for an otherwise slow newsday” then yes techinically it could be news. If your definition of news is “substantially noteworthy information” than this is most certainly not news

        • XTornado@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          […] and if you people look at your right you can see the one guy who decides what it’s “substantially noteworthy information” and what not.

          • Is he the only one?
          • Yes, it was discovered by scientists when checking a Lemmy post.