Synopsis:

A major argument of the book is that the imprecise, informal, community-building indebtedness of “human economies” is only replaced by mathematically precise, firmly enforced debts through the introduction of violence, usually state-sponsored violence in some form of military or police.

A second major argument of the book is that, contrary to standard accounts of the history of money, debt is probably the oldest means of trade, with cash and barter transactions being later developments.

Debt, the book argues, has typically retained its primacy, with cash and barter usually limited to situations of low trust involving strangers or those not considered credit-worthy. Graeber proposes that the second argument follows from the first; that, in his words, “markets are founded and usually maintained by systematic state violence”, though he goes on to show how “in the absence of such violence, they… can even come to be seen as the very basis of freedom and autonomy”.

Hello, this part will be 2 weeks long due to my move. Argue, discuss, this is the thread. Remember to join Perusall.

Please refer to the Perusall post for more information but to briefly recap how to join, view and annotate this book:

• Go to Perusall.com
• Create an Account
• Click on Enroll in a Course
• Enter this code: HAYACA-PVMCJ